Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

To the extent I hear anything about tennis, its' Serena, a Eurotrash player or some scandal involving the men's game.

 

Maybe her biggest problem is how dominant she is. The sport would probably be better off with somebody who can be a real rival to Serena.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
To the extent I hear anything about tennis, its' Serena, a Eurotrash player or some scandal involving the men's game.

 

Maybe her biggest problem is how dominant she is. The sport would probably be better off with somebody who can be a real rival to Serena.

 

Might be. Not a perfect comparison, but like with Rousey, I knew of her and knew she was unbeatable. But I had never seen one of her fights. And I had no idea she was fighting the night that she lost until the whole world went insane about her losing. Now I'm actually fairly interested in the rematch.

Posted
To the extent I hear anything about tennis, its' Serena, a Eurotrash player or some scandal involving the men's game.

 

Maybe her biggest problem is how dominant she is. The sport would probably be better off with somebody who can be a real rival to Serena.

 

Might be. Not a perfect comparison, but like with Rousey, I knew of her and knew she was unbeatable. But I had never seen one of her fights. And I had no idea she was fighting the night that she lost until the whole world went insane about her losing. Now I'm actually fairly interested in the rematch.

Oh come on, that's not only not a perfect comparison but a terrible one. Rousey is a made up star in a made up sport. She exists solely as a product of marketing.

Posted
To the extent I hear anything about tennis, its' Serena, a Eurotrash player or some scandal involving the men's game.

 

Maybe her biggest problem is how dominant she is. The sport would probably be better off with somebody who can be a real rival to Serena.

 

Might be. Not a perfect comparison, but like with Rousey, I knew of her and knew she was unbeatable. But I had never seen one of her fights. And I had no idea she was fighting the night that she lost until the whole world went insane about her losing. Now I'm actually fairly interested in the rematch.

Oh come on, that's not only not a perfect comparison but a terrible one. Rousey is a made up star in a made up sport. She exists solely as a product of marketing.

 

I honestly don't even know enough about it to even begin to have those opinions on it.

 

/Davidwood

Community Moderator
Posted
To the extent I hear anything about tennis, its' Serena, a Eurotrash player or some scandal involving the men's game.

 

Maybe her biggest problem is how dominant she is. The sport would probably be better off with somebody who can be a real rival to Serena.

 

Might be. Not a perfect comparison, but like with Rousey, I knew of her and knew she was unbeatable. But I had never seen one of her fights. And I had no idea she was fighting the night that she lost until the whole world went insane about her losing. Now I'm actually fairly interested in the rematch.

Oh come on, that's not only not a perfect comparison but a terrible one. Rousey is a made up star in a made up sport. She exists solely as a product of marketing.

 

Plus, Serena's been winning majors for like 17 years. Ronda's career has been....less.

Posted
What's a made up sport though?

 

Ultimate BoxingWrestlingKicky Championship

 

Why is that more made up than any other sport? Because it's newer?

Community Moderator
Posted
What's a made up sport though?

 

Ultimate BoxingWrestlingKicky Championship

 

Why is that more made up than any other sport? Because it's newer?

 

It's not newer. It's two people beating each other up. Nothing new about that. I'm not as adamant about it being a "made up sport". It's just a dumb one.

Posted

Anyway, I don't have strong feelings about either sport nor do I have much interest.

 

The point was basically I thought Rousey was this unbeatable behemoth in a female sport. Then she lost and I actually went from being completely uninterested to being mildly interested in the next event. As far as I know, Serena is an unbeatable behemoth (by tennis standards), so I'd probably be more interested in watching a match if I thought she were actually being challenged. The comparisons beyond that don't really matter. Analogies aren't about the similarities in the things themselves but in the relationships between the things.

 

So, again, not a great analogy, but my point was, yes, I agree, if Serena had a legit challenger I'd probably become more interested as an outsider who presently has zero interest, just like happened when I heard about Rousey getting her ass kicked and losing on extremely long odds.

Posted

 

Ultimate BoxingWrestlingKicky Championship

 

Why is that more made up than any other sport? Because it's newer?

newer and douchier and stupider

 

I'm OK with this. MMA and all that stuff seems to be all of that.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
This was Martina Navratilova at the age Serena is now:

 

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1385508.1435955574!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_1200/martina-navratilova-1990.jpg

 

freaking dying ahahhahahahahahha

Posted
This was Martina Navratilova at the age Serena is now:

 

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1385508.1435955574!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_1200/martina-navratilova-1990.jpg

 

freaking dying ahahhahahahahahha

LOL

Posted
Maybe I missed his name, but Christopher Russo would be a finalist for me. He and Stephen A.

 

Russo is awful... I guess he's just not relevant enough.

Community Moderator
Posted
That is a really well organized bracket, honestly. MIght be able to nitpick some seeding here and there, but not much.
Posted
Maybe I missed his name, but Christopher Russo would be a finalist for me. He and Stephen A.

 

Russo is awful... I guess he's just not relevant enough.

More relevant that Mariotti if you ask me. Also Clay Travis isn't relevant enough to be a 1 seed. I'd easily go 16 over 1 in that matchup.

Posted
Maybe I missed his name, but Christopher Russo would be a finalist for me. He and Stephen A.

 

Russo is awful... I guess he's just not relevant enough.

More relevant that Mariotti if you ask me. Also Clay Travis isn't relevant enough to be a 1 seed. I'd easily go 16 over 1 in that matchup.

I have no idea what a "Clay Travis" is other than some weird hybrid of various country singers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...