Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Worst decision made by a manager in baseball this season.

 

Oh man I was too busy raging from ARCubsfan's post to notice this. You guys are a great 1-2 punch

  • Replies 368
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Worst decision made by a manager in baseball this season.

 

LOL. Continue to be the worst.

Posted
Worst decision made by a manager in baseball this season.

http://i.imgur.com/SuJ8PXF.gif

 

I understand certain guys calling out my knee-jerk reactions but you just made like 15 far worse posts.

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

Posted
I mean honestly when you have the bottom of the order up against Chapman it's pretty much over.

 

Define "pretty much." Because, I agree, Aroldis Chapman with a 2- or 3-run lead means it is gonna be tough to come back. But, a 2-run lead, with two guys on, one out, and another inning still to go?

Posted
I mean honestly when you have the bottom of the order up against Chapman it's pretty much over.

 

Define "pretty much." Because, I agree, Aroldis Chapman with a 2- or 3-run lead means it is gonna be tough to come back. But, a 2-run lead, with two guys on, one out, and another inning still to go?

I actually think that was a good call by Maddon. That was your best shot to tie it if it worked.

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

 

Baserunners were 8 for 8 stealing on Chapman prior to that attempt. Hitters are 5 for 195 getting an XBH with a .196 average. SB + 1B is a much higher percentage play than 2B or 1B + 1B

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

 

Baserunners were 8 for 8 stealing on Chapman prior to that attempt. Hitters are 5 for 195 getting an XBH with a .196 average. SB + 1B is a much higher percentage play than 2B or 1B + 1B

You're relying on the Cubs getting 2 straight hits off Chapman to tie it too. That wasn't going to happen. Your best shot is one hit.

Posted
I mean honestly when you have the bottom of the order up against Chapman it's pretty much over.

 

Define "pretty much." Because, I agree, Aroldis Chapman with a 2- or 3-run lead means it is gonna be tough to come back. But, a 2-run lead, with two guys on, one out, and another inning still to go?

I actually think that was a good call by Maddon. That was your best shot to tie it if it worked.

 

I don't. Granted, I don't think it was the worst decision of the season by any manager, but I don't think it was a good call.

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

 

Baserunners were 8 for 8 stealing on Chapman prior to that attempt. Hitters are 5 for 195 getting an XBH with a .196 average. SB + 1B is a much higher percentage play than 2B or 1B + 1B

 

He could also walk Starlin, or hit him with a pitch. Or there could be an error. Or a passed ball could move the runners up. I just don't think it is worth it to risk the out.

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

 

Baserunners were 8 for 8 stealing on Chapman prior to that attempt. Hitters are 5 for 195 getting an XBH with a .196 average. SB + 1B is a much higher percentage play than 2B or 1B + 1B

 

Normally I'd hate that call, which I did until I got this whole 8-8 stealing information. That makes it a much more palatable call for me, especially with the numbers against Chapman otherwise.

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

 

Baserunners were 8 for 8 stealing on Chapman prior to that attempt. Hitters are 5 for 195 getting an XBH with a .196 average. SB + 1B is a much higher percentage play than 2B or 1B + 1B

 

He could also walk Starlin, or hit him with a pitch. Or there could be an error. Or a passed ball could move the runners up. I just don't think it is worth it to risk the out.

 

OBP + 1B doesn't fare much better, odds wise.

Posted
I get that if its successful you are a single away from tying it but if it's not you allow a still fresh Chapman to mow through the bottom of the Cubs order in the 9th

 

So the extra 1-4 pitches Starlin would have made Chapman throw would tire him out?

 

The main point was that I'd rather let my guys bat with the tying run on base

 

Baserunners were 8 for 8 stealing on Chapman prior to that attempt. Hitters are 5 for 195 getting an XBH with a .196 average. SB + 1B is a much higher percentage play than 2B or 1B + 1B

 

Normally I'd hate that call, which I did until I got this whole 8-8 stealing information. That makes it a much more palatable call for me, especially with the numbers against Chapman otherwise.

 

An 8 stolen-base-attempt sample is enough to change your mind? For his career, opponents have now been successful 24 out of 37 times. That's less than 65% of the time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...