Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

When did they start using the DH in NL parks? And can we just use that as a steppingstone to using it across MLB already?

 

Pretty shitty argument from the league as to why the DH isn't in the NL if it's used in the highest profile game they have all season.

Posted
When did they start using the DH in NL parks? And can we just use that as a steppingstone to using it across MLB already?

 

Pretty [expletive] argument from the league as to why the DH isn't in the NL if it's used in the highest profile game they have all season.

 

They have been doing it since 2010, and it's really mostly to keep the scorecard clean.

Community Moderator
Posted
Of course, I'm also a big (and perhaps last?) fan of the non-DH format in the NL. I love as much strategy needed in a game as possible, and the DH often takes a lot of that enjoyment away.

 

There's still plenty of fans of it. Just a lot of people are willing to give it up if it means standardizing the rules across the league, as they realize that the DH isn't ever going away in the AL.

Posted
Of course, I'm also a big (and perhaps last?) fan of the non-DH format in the NL. I love as much strategy needed in a game as possible, and the DH often takes a lot of that enjoyment away.

 

There's still plenty of fans of it. Just a lot of people are willing to give it up if it means standardizing the rules across the league, as they realize that the DH isn't ever going away in the AL.

Plus injecting additional offense into this pitching-dominated climate.

Posted
Of course, I'm also a big (and perhaps last?) fan of the non-DH format in the NL. I love as much strategy needed in a game as possible, and the DH often takes a lot of that enjoyment away.

 

There's still plenty of fans of it. Just a lot of people are willing to give it up if it means standardizing the rules across the league, as they realize that the DH isn't ever going away in the AL.

 

There's no GD strategy in baseball. It's out out out out out 1 run out out game over.

Posted
Of course, I'm also a big (and perhaps last?) fan of the non-DH format in the NL. I love as much strategy needed in a game as possible, and the DH often takes a lot of that enjoyment away.

 

There's still plenty of fans of it. Just a lot of people are willing to give it up if it means standardizing the rules across the league, as they realize that the DH isn't ever going away in the AL.

 

There's no GD strategy in baseball. It's out out out out out 1 run out out game over.

 

Ah, but to get that one run could require 15 decisions in the NL. I love it!

Posted
Of course, I'm also a big (and perhaps last?) fan of the non-DH format in the NL. I love as much strategy needed in a game as possible, and the DH often takes a lot of that enjoyment away.

 

There's still plenty of fans of it. Just a lot of people are willing to give it up if it means standardizing the rules across the league, as they realize that the DH isn't ever going away in the AL.

 

There's no GD strategy in baseball. It's out out out out out 1 run out out game over.

 

Ah, but to get that one run could require 15 decisions in the NL. I love it!

and every one of those decisions is:

 

should we pinch hit for our shitty hitting pitcher? Not yet.

should we pinch hit for our shitty hitting pitcher? Not yet.

should we pinch hit for our shitty hitting pitcher? Not yet.

Posted
Of course, I'm also a big (and perhaps last?) fan of the non-DH format in the NL. I love as much strategy needed in a game as possible, and the DH often takes a lot of that enjoyment away.

 

There's still plenty of fans of it. Just a lot of people are willing to give it up if it means standardizing the rules across the league, as they realize that the DH isn't ever going away in the AL.

 

There's no GD strategy in baseball. It's out out out out out 1 run out out game over.

 

Ah, but to get that one run could require 15 decisions in the NL. I love it!

and every one of those decisions is:

 

should we pinch hit for our [expletive] hitting pitcher? Not yet.

should we pinch hit for our [expletive] hitting pitcher? Not yet.

should we pinch hit for our [expletive] hitting pitcher? Not yet.

 

So much more than that. Hell, ask Joe Maddon about it if you ever see him on the street.

Guest
Guests
Posted

All that "strategy" makes like a .001% difference. There's no [expletive] strategy.

 

There's strategy in football. In baseball there's just a bunch of 30-40% rolls of dices.

Posted
All that "strategy" makes like a .001% difference. There's no [expletive] strategy.

 

There's strategy in football. In baseball there's just a bunch of 30-40% rolls of dices.

 

I wonder the last time an AL manager had to decide whether or not to take out his best offensive player because he just made the last out of a tie game in the late innings.

 

And holy [expletive], no strategy in baseball? Are you [expletive] kidding me?

Guest
Guests
Posted
All that "strategy" makes like a .001% difference. There's no [expletive] strategy.

 

There's strategy in football. In baseball there's just a bunch of 30-40% rolls of dices.

 

I wonder the last time an AL manager had to decide whether or not to take out his best offensive player because he just made the last out of a tie game in the late innings.

 

And holy [expletive], no strategy in baseball? Are you [expletive] kidding me?

Not kidding you in the least. That's why complete buffoon meatheads can be "successful" managers.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Dusty [expletive] baker got the cubs further than they've been since 1945 (when there were no playoffs so even that is arguable)
Posted (edited)
All that "strategy" makes like a .001% difference. There's no [expletive] strategy.

 

There's strategy in football. In baseball there's just a bunch of 30-40% rolls of dices.

 

I wonder the last time an AL manager had to decide whether or not to take out his best offensive player because he just made the last out of a tie game in the late innings.

 

And holy [expletive], no strategy in baseball? Are you [expletive] kidding me?

Not kidding you in the least. That's why complete buffoon meatheads can be "successful" managers.

 

And there are shitty coaches who have won or gotten to Super Bowls. Obviously, having great talent is the No. 1 key to success.

 

But to say there is no strategy in baseball goes higher than just the managers. I'm talking the entire game that's played on the field, from pitch selection, etc. There is a ton of strategy in this game.

Edited by Bryant's Disco Ball
Posted
But to say there is no strategy in baseball goes higher than just the managers. I'm talking the entire game that's played on the field, from pitch selection, etc. There is a ton of strategy in this game.

 

Well then if you are talking about that then the increased "strategy" a pitcher must use to face a 9th quality hitter negates any lost should I pinch hit questions.

 

 

Also, only idiots double switch their best hitters.

Posted
But to say there is no strategy in baseball goes higher than just the managers. I'm talking the entire game that's played on the field, from pitch selection, etc. There is a ton of strategy in this game.

 

Well then if you are talking about that then the increased "strategy" a pitcher must use to face a 9th quality hitter negates any lost should I pinch hit questions.

 

 

Also, only idiots double switch their best hitters.

 

Fair enough.

 

To sum up, I'm just saying that I enjoy the different decisions a manager in the NL has to make compared to the AL, and that I like NL style of ball better. Managers in general don't mean much, but the decisions they have to make during the course of an NL game is something I find more fascinating and fun.

Community Moderator
Posted
Oh, good, the DH debate again. We don't do this enough.

 

I mean, it is a baseball message board, and it's an extremely divisive topic. Good chance it's going to come up on occasion.

Posted

So, yeah, I was unaware they've been doing this since 2010 ,thanks for the answer.

 

I get both sides of the DH argument and am really on the fence, but this example is a pretty bad look for the hardcore NL-ers out there.

 

Let's hope Rizzo does well enough to further the discussion.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
So, yeah, I was unaware they've been doing this since 2010 ,thanks for the answer.

 

I get both sides of the DH argument and am really on the fence, but this example is a pretty bad look for the hardcore NL-ers out there.

 

Let's hope Rizzo does well enough to further the discussion.

It's pretty much irrelevant to those, like me, that prefer the NL style. No pitcher is ever going to bat in an All-Star Game as it's currently played anyway, so this makes it easier for the managers to execute the real purpose of the game, to get as many players on the field as possible for as long as possible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...