Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

 

They take a big break once a year and don't come back for like five months or whatever. That seems like a good place to start counting at any given time.

  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted

that's silly. how do you even define what right now is?

 

baseball is constant ebbs and flows

 

the problem is the guys who have sucked overall and yes, starlin has sucked really badly overall

 

Arbitrary endpoint stats are the worst of all possible stats. They're worse than wins and RBIs.

 

yes and no. depends on if the end points are truly arbitrary or if you're looking for a trend based on some actual thing and if the span is large enough to be meaningful.

Guest
Guests
Posted
you're looking for a trend

 

Ick. That is *exactly* the problem.

 

way to take out the context you moron

Guest
Guests
Posted
if an actual adjustment is made, an injury comes into (or out of) play, or some other similar situation, and there's a decent sample of PAs, they can be meaningful. this isn't hard to grasp. hence the qualifier as to whether they're actually truly arbitrary endpoints or not.
Guest
Guests
Posted
did you know: Javy Baez is hitting .383/.457/.654 since May 10th

 

before you know it, your title will no longer be facetious

Guest
Guests
Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

That's still arbitrary.

Guest
Guests
Posted

If you've identified a distinct causal factor (such as a swing change), then using that endpoint has some validity.

 

btw - we should also note that at the beginning of the year, Javy was coming off an extended break, the disappointment of the demotion and the turmoil of his family tragedy. It's fairly realistic to cut him a break for that time.

Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

That's still arbitrary.

 

http://media0.giphy.com/media/iuYjCue42yNtC/giphy.gif

Guest
Guests
Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

That's still arbitrary.

 

Then...what isn't?

Well, in some sense you're always making an arbitrary decision as to when to begin if you make a blanket statement like that. For example, if you're analyzing Pujols performance to predict the remainder of the year, would it make more sense to look at his career or to attempt to do a weighted trend of his last three years of performance?

 

Any blanket statement of when to begin and end all analysis is going to be arbitrary.

 

 

In another sense, I like watching N&G's head explode.

Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

ESPECIALLY when it is a 21-year-old working on overhauling their approach and and changing his swing mechanics.

Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

ESPECIALLY when it is a 21-year-old working on overhauling their approach and and changing his swing mechanics.

 

I was not aware Addison was doing any such thing.

Guest
Guests
Posted
In another sense, I like watching N&G's head explode.

 

Go pretend to be drunk again, you dweeb.

Oh, I was fully drunk that night.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

ESPECIALLY when it is a 21-year-old working on overhauling their approach and and changing his swing mechanics.

 

I was not aware Addison was doing any such thing.

 

I thought this was about Montero

Posted
In another sense, I like watching N&G's head explode.

 

Go pretend to be drunk again, you dweeb.

Oh, I was fully drunk that night.

 

xuer yuo wert

Guest
Guests
Posted
In another sense, I like watching N&G's head explode.

 

Go pretend to be drunk again, you dweeb.

Oh, I was fully drunk that night.

 

xuer yuo wert

 

hahahahahahaha

Community Moderator
Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

That's still arbitrary.

 

Then...what isn't?

Well, in some sense you're always making an arbitrary decision as to when to begin if you make a blanket statement like that. For example, if you're analyzing Pujols performance to predict the remainder of the year, would it make more sense to look at his career or to attempt to do a weighted trend of his last three years of performance?

 

Any blanket statement of when to begin and end all analysis is going to be arbitrary.

 

 

In another sense, I like watching N&G's head explode.

 

Yeah, I deleted my post, cuz I realized it was more about that last bit.

Posted
Baseball stats should only be taken in sum career totals at any given moment.

ESPECIALLY when it is a 21-year-old working on overhauling their approach and and changing his swing mechanics.

 

I was not aware Addison was doing any such thing.

 

I thought this was about Montero

I guess I was reading the thread about Javy and misplaced my thoughts. Regardless, if it's a blanket statement it would apply. And I guess Javy is 22 years old. I probably shouldn't try to post on my way out of the office (or, maybe, ever).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...