Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)

Scheduled Games (All Times Central)

 

Iowa lost 4-1 Box Score

 

CF Szczur 0/4

SS Baez 0/4, 2 K

3B Villanueva 1/3, 2B

SP Rusin 6 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 0 BB, 5 K

 

 

Kane County won 4-3 in 12 innings Box Score

 

CF Hannemann 2/5, SB

RF Balaguert 1/5

LF Martin 1/5

SS Penalver 1/5

SP Tseng 5 IP, 8 H, 3 ER, 0 BB, 5 K

RP Concepcion 3 IP, 1 H, 0 BB, 3 K

 

Tennessee has the day off

Daytona was rained out

 

 

Probable Starters

 

Iowa: LHP Chris Rusin

Daytona: RHP Felix Pena

Kane County: RHP Jen-Ho Tseng

Edited by ctcf

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Yeah I'm really intrigued to see how Tseng starts out. Didn't somebody (Law?) say they saw Tseng's ceiling as a no. 2? There's already so damn much to feel good about on the minor league front - adding another TOR potential pitcher to the mix would be huge.
Guest
Guests
Posted
Law hated Tseng, it was probably the BP guys where that got thrown around.
Posted
Law hated Tseng, it was probably the BP guys where that got thrown around.

No surprise, but you're absolutely right. It was Parks who said ceiling was 2/3 (and that he'd put him in the Cubs top 10 prospects).

Posted
Law hated Tseng, it was probably the BP guys where that got thrown around.

Yeah Parks said he would put Tseng in the Cubs top ten. Law had basically nothing good to say (surprise, surprise).

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Parks said that after seeing Tseng once, while still riding the high from all the twitter love he was getting from cubs fans over his javier baez posts. let's not start sucking our own popsicles yet.
Posted
Parks said that after seeing Tseng once, while still riding the high from all the twitter love he was getting from cubs fans over his javier baez posts. let's not start sucking our own popsicles yet.

Isn't that how most of these guys base their rankings at this point? Hell, Law will watch a guy once and use that as the basis of his opinion for 2-3 years.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So Law was totally wrong about Szczur.
Posted
So Law was totally wrong about Szczur.

 

Yeah he's looking pretty good with that one. He also never liked Brett Jackson; I'm not sure he ever had him as a top 100 prospect which seemed pretty crazy.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So Law was totally wrong about Szczur.

 

Yeah he's looking pretty good with that one. He also never liked Brett Jackson; I'm not sure he ever had him as a top 100 prospect which seemed pretty crazy.

 

 

Yeah. He did love him some Lee, though, so there's a strike against.

Guest
Guests
Posted
If you hate every prospect, you'll be right against the grain on a very high percentage of them.

 

Except he liked our system a lot before it was cool to do so.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So Law was totally wrong about Szczur.

 

His minor league IsoP is still about double Juan Pierre's, so yes, he was.

 

That's the thing that people miss about the Law/Szczur stuff. It's not that he was pessimistic about Szczur, it's the absurd hyperbole he used in trying to talk down to all the idiots he thought beneath him, probably because more casual Cubs fans knew of Szczur with the football angle.

Guest
Guests
Posted
So Law was totally wrong about Szczur.

 

His minor league IsoP is still about double Juan Pierre's, so yes, he was.

 

That's the thing that people miss about the Law/Szczur stuff. It's not that he was pessimistic about Szczur, it's the absurd hyperbole he used in trying to talk down to all the idiots he thought beneath him, probably because more casual Cubs fans knew of Szczur with the football angle.

 

Eh, comparing a guy with no power to a guy with even less power doesn't bother me much as far as hyperbole goes.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Parks/Rubio (BP) and Badler/Norris (BA) saw Tseng the same day and were absolutely in love. Law saw Tseng the next time out and said he looked bad. It's makes sense that they are all accurate; Tseng did go from the top international pitching prospect to barely being in the top 30 to a guy being offered over $1 million by multiple teams in half a year last year because his stuff fluctuated so much.
Guest
Guests
Posted
So Law was totally wrong about Szczur.

 

His minor league IsoP is still about double Juan Pierre's, so yes, he was.

 

That's the thing that people miss about the Law/Szczur stuff. It's not that he was pessimistic about Szczur, it's the absurd hyperbole he used in trying to talk down to all the idiots he thought beneath him, probably because more casual Cubs fans knew of Szczur with the football angle.

 

Eh, comparing a guy with no power to a guy with even less power doesn't bother me much as far as hyperbole goes.

I expect more out of an expert, but that's me.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Parks/Rubio (BP) and Badler/Norris (BA) saw Tseng the same day and were absolutely in love. Law saw Tseng the next time out and said he looked bad. It's makes sense that they are all accurate; Tseng did go from the top international pitching prospect to barely being in the top 30 to a guy being offered over $1 million by multiple teams in half a year last year because his stuff fluctuated so much.

 

Great point. Guys don't look the same every game, so why shouldn't scouting evaluations fluctuate accordingly? Seems perfectly fair to me.

 

There are a lot of guys who look good at times. If you see Alberto cabrera at his best, or Rosscup, or Marcus Mateo, or Edwin Jackson, or Brett Jackson or Vitters, you can project great things for them.

 

On Law and Cub prospects, another guy he likes very well was Paniagua. We'll see how that one turns out.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
After allowing singles to three of first four guys, Tseng now has allowed only one more single through the 4th inning, with 4 K's/0 walks. Only one groundout (other than a bunt). I assume he's done after 4. Nice pro debut.
Posted
After allowing singles to three of first four guys, Tseng now has allowed only one more single through the 4th inning, with 4 K's/0 walks. Only one groundout (other than a bunt). I assume he's done after 4. Nice pro debut.

 

At KC and he's still just 19 right? That is darn impressive.

Guest
Guests
Posted

Hannemann is 2 for 2 with a SB

 

Villanueva has a double and a K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...