Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Not necessarily '10-'11 news, but IU gets verbal commitment from 2014 (!) G James Blackmon, Jr. If it sticks this is a great get for Tom Crean.

 

Link

 

Calipari should be out of NCAA by then, so it's one less coach to worry about poaching him

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Not necessarily '10-'11 news, but IU gets verbal commitment from 2014 (!) G James Blackmon, Jr. If it sticks this is a great get for Tom Crean.

 

Link

Calipari should be out of NCAA by then, so it's one less coach to worry about poaching him

 

Finally, something we can agree on. :wink:

Posted
OK, now I'm feeling old. I was already an adult when James Blackmon Sr. was a high schooler at Marion and then a college player at UK.
Posted
Name me one thing Calipari has done wrong.

Lol, at this point you have to be joking. Hey when is that lawsuit from Kentucky or the Davis' family coming against the Sun Times?

Posted
What's the difference between that Turkish guy and someone like Chris Weinke going from minor league baseball to college football?

 

Getting paid for that sport, I'm pretty sure.

Posted
That doesn't seem like a material difference to me.

 

Really? Seems like it's the whole point to me. If you're on a football scholarship what does it matter if your job before enrolling was minor league outfielder or pizza delivery guy? On the other hand, if you got paid for the sport you're receiving a scholarship to play as an amateur...

Posted
That doesn't seem like a material difference to me.

 

Really? Seems like it's the whole point to me. If you're on a football scholarship what does it matter if your job before enrolling was minor league outfielder or pizza delivery guy? On the other hand, if you got paid for the sport you're receiving a scholarship to play as an amateur...

 

Is it the whole point? I think it's just another random NCAA bylaw that doesn't require any public justification because hey, they're the NCAA.

 

Plus wasn't Jeremy Bloom declared ineligible to play football because he was a professional skier? Doesn't that disprove the thesis that playing the same sport professionally and then as an amateur is the "whole point" ?

Posted
That doesn't seem like a material difference to me.

 

Really? Seems like it's the whole point to me. If you're on a football scholarship what does it matter if your job before enrolling was minor league outfielder or pizza delivery guy? On the other hand, if you got paid for the sport you're receiving a scholarship to play as an amateur...

 

Is it the whole point? I think it's just another random NCAA bylaw that doesn't require any public justification because hey, they're the NCAA.

 

Plus wasn't Jeremy Bloom declared ineligible to play football because he was a professional skier? Doesn't that disprove the thesis that playing the same sport professionally and then as an amateur is the "whole point" ?

 

I'm not going to argue the NCAA is completely logical. I think the idea that you can't get paid for playing a sport then go back and play as an amateur is a sound one.

 

Bloom was ineligible because he had endorsement deals.

Posted

In theory, Usain Bolt could stop being a millionaire sprinter and go play college football anywhere in America while some guy scratching out a living playing obscure European pro basketball can't play college basketball. Why is one ok and one not?

 

Are engineers stopped from returning to college for further engineering education because they're already making a living as an engineer? What's the difference?

 

I think the public reflexively takes the NCAAs bylaws as fair and sound when they have no real, logical hurdles to overcome.

Posted
In theory, Usain Bolt could stop being a millionaire sprinter and go play college football anywhere in America while some guy scratching out a living playing obscure European pro basketball can't play college basketball. Why is one ok and one not?

 

Are engineers stopped from returning to college for further engineering education because they're already making a living as an engineer? What's the difference?

 

I think the public reflexively takes the NCAAs bylaws as fair and sound when they have no real, logical hurdles to overcome.

Because in basketball the kid isn't an amateur. Since the NCAA is amatuer athletics, professionals arn't allowed to play it.

Posted
In theory, Usain Bolt could stop being a millionaire sprinter and go play college football anywhere in America while some guy scratching out a living playing obscure European pro basketball can't play college basketball. Why is one ok and one not?

 

Are engineers stopped from returning to college for further engineering education because they're already making a living as an engineer? What's the difference?

 

I think the public reflexively takes the NCAAs bylaws as fair and sound when they have no real, logical hurdles to overcome.

Because in basketball the kid isn't an amateur. Since the NCAA is amatuer athletics, professionals arn't allowed to play it.

 

By that logic Michael Jordan is still a professional basketball player.

Posted
The one thing I never figured out is how baseball players are allowed to have advisers when they're drafted in HS or their junior year, not sign with a team, and then play college ball. The James Paxton thing alone gave me a massive headache.
Posted
In theory, Usain Bolt could stop being a millionaire sprinter and go play college football anywhere in America while some guy scratching out a living playing obscure European pro basketball can't play college basketball. Why is one ok and one not?

 

Are engineers stopped from returning to college for further engineering education because they're already making a living as an engineer? What's the difference?

 

I think the public reflexively takes the NCAAs bylaws as fair and sound when they have no real, logical hurdles to overcome.

Because in basketball the kid isn't an amateur. Since the NCAA is amatuer athletics, professionals arn't allowed to play it.

 

By that logic Michael Jordan is still a professional basketball player.

No not at all, once you are paid you aren't an amateur.

Posted
What's the difference between that Turkish guy and someone like Chris Weinke going from minor league baseball to college football?

 

Getting paid for that sport, I'm pretty sure.

 

Different sports, plus Weinke and even Ricky Williams were not on scholorship but more considered walk-on status. Still even at that it is tricky, going back to that professional skier who also played at Colorado not being able recieving endorsement money. Johnny Evans or something like that.

Posted
In theory, Usain Bolt could stop being a millionaire sprinter and go play college football anywhere in America while some guy scratching out a living playing obscure European pro basketball can't play college basketball. Why is one ok and one not?

 

Are engineers stopped from returning to college for further engineering education because they're already making a living as an engineer? What's the difference?

 

I think the public reflexively takes the NCAAs bylaws as fair and sound when they have no real, logical hurdles to overcome.

 

To what extent should this logic be carried out. Can Lebron play for Kentucky on his off days?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...