Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Grabow lobbying to bring on Matt Capps


GlassCow
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why does Muskat takes so much grief over writing her articles for Cubs.com? I thought the article was fairly informative, and considering the off season so far, I'm sure it takes some work to get a story together.

 

Her articles are all puff pieces. It's PR, not journalism. The fact that it takes effort is meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Muskat takes so much grief over writing her articles for Cubs.com? I thought the article was fairly informative, and considering the off season so far, I'm sure it takes some work to get a story together.

 

Her articles are all puff pieces. It's PR, not journalism. The fact that it takes effort is meaningless.

 

She works for Cubs.com, what do you expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Muskat takes so much grief over writing her articles for Cubs.com? I thought the article was fairly informative, and considering the off season so far, I'm sure it takes some work to get a story together.

 

Her articles are all puff pieces. It's PR, not journalism. The fact that it takes effort is meaningless.

 

She works for Cubs.com, what do you expect?

 

I expect to ignore her pointless articles, which is what I do. But I was answering your question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can hear the Grabow/Capps exchange now:

 

Grabow: This place is great. It's just like Pittsburgh but with a full stadium, a ton of undeserved money and a ton of day games so you can go get drunk after all of them

 

Capps: How are the women?

 

Grabow: A hell of a lot better than Pittsburgh

 

Capps: I'm in. 2 years/$18 million sounds great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Muskat takes so much grief over writing her articles for Cubs.com? I thought the article was fairly informative, and considering the off season so far, I'm sure it takes some work to get a story together.

 

Her articles are all puff pieces. It's PR, not journalism. The fact that it takes effort is meaningless.

 

That (PR) is what she's paid to do. It's kind of dumb to criticize her for doing her job. Even if she wanted to write and publish something that criticized the Cubs, she wouldn't be allowed to and the negative part of the story would be cut out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Muskat takes so much grief over writing her articles for Cubs.com? I thought the article was fairly informative, and considering the off season so far, I'm sure it takes some work to get a story together.

 

Her articles are all puff pieces. It's PR, not journalism. The fact that it takes effort is meaningless.

 

That (PR) is what she's paid to do. It's kind of dumb to criticize her for doing her job. Even if she wanted to write and publish something that criticized the Cubs, she wouldn't be allowed to and the negative part of the story would be cut out.

 

Just because it's her job doesn't mean you can't criticize her work. It's a columnists job to offer an opinion that drives readership, even if it's a dumbass opinion. Can I not criticize the dumbass opinion because he's doing his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Muskat takes so much grief over writing her articles for Cubs.com? I thought the article was fairly informative, and considering the off season so far, I'm sure it takes some work to get a story together.

 

Her articles are all puff pieces. It's PR, not journalism. The fact that it takes effort is meaningless.

 

That (PR) is what she's paid to do. It's kind of dumb to criticize her for doing her job. Even if she wanted to write and publish something that criticized the Cubs, she wouldn't be allowed to and the negative part of the story would be cut out.

 

Just because it's her job doesn't mean you can't criticize her work. It's a columnists job to offer an opinion that drives readership, even if it's a [expletive] opinion. Can I not criticize the [expletive] opinion because he's doing his job.

 

Those are two completely different jobs.

 

The columnist has a choice on what to write, whether that is positive or negative, right or wrong. As long as it drives readership, the newspaper/magazine doesn't care. The journalist has a job to state the facts and report on a situation whether it's positive or negative. PR people aren't getting paid to criticize the people that she work for. PR people aren't getting paid to be negative about the team (and any negative things they write are, as I said, certainly edited out).

 

Muskat's job is to write things that make the Cubs look good and put a positive spin on all things Cub related, even if it's not necessarily a good thing. It's fine to criticize her work if she gets facts wrong or doesn't know certain things that she should know as it pertains to the Cubs. But all she's doing is her job which is PR. It doesn't make sense to criticize Muskat for writing puff pieces when that's exactly what she's paid to do.

 

If you're expecting hard hitting journalism from Muskat, you're crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...