Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 780
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
that penalty was ridiculous. he was trying to recover the ball and gets a flag cus the pats get an unleaky break.

 

 

Yea, it's not like the Pats got shafted when the Giants fumbled and somehow came up with the ball after Woods clearly recovered and was down. The refs are trying to give it to the Pats, for sure.

Posted
that penalty was ridiculous. he was trying to recover the ball and gets a flag cus the pats get an unleaky break.

 

 

Yea, it's not like the Pats got shafted when the Giants fumbled and somehow came up with the ball after Woods clearly recovered and was down. The refs are trying to give it to the Pats, for sure.

 

he didnt recover that fumble, it was in his legs. he never even had possession of it.

Posted
that penalty was ridiculous. he was trying to recover the ball and gets a flag cus the pats get an unleaky break.

 

 

Yea, it's not like the Pats got shafted when the Giants fumbled and somehow came up with the ball after Woods clearly recovered and was down. The refs are trying to give it to the Pats, for sure.

 

he didnt recover that fumble, it was in his legs. he never even had possession of it.

 

The Pats guy fell on it and the ball was underneath his chest/stomach. I don't know where you saw the ball in his legs.

Posted
that penalty was ridiculous. he was trying to recover the ball and gets a flag cus the pats get an unleaky break.

 

 

Yea, it's not like the Pats got shafted when the Giants fumbled and somehow came up with the ball after Woods clearly recovered and was down. The refs are trying to give it to the Pats, for sure.

 

he didnt recover that fumble, it was in his legs. he never even had possession of it.

 

The Pats guy fell on it and the ball was underneath his chest/stomach. I don't know where you saw the ball in his legs.

 

on FOX

Posted
that penalty was ridiculous. he was trying to recover the ball and gets a flag cus the pats get an unleaky break.

 

 

Yea, it's not like the Pats got shafted when the Giants fumbled and somehow came up with the ball after Woods clearly recovered and was down. The refs are trying to give it to the Pats, for sure.

 

he didnt recover that fumble, it was in his legs. he never even had possession of it.

 

The Pats guy fell on it and the ball was underneath his chest/stomach. I don't know where you saw the ball in his legs.

 

on FOX

 

Guess you're watching a different FOX channel than the rest of the universe is.

Posted
that penalty was ridiculous. he was trying to recover the ball and gets a flag cus the pats get an unleaky break.

 

 

Yea, it's not like the Pats got shafted when the Giants fumbled and somehow came up with the ball after Woods clearly recovered and was down. The refs are trying to give it to the Pats, for sure.

 

he didnt recover that fumble, it was in his legs. he never even had possession of it.

 

The Pats guy fell on it and the ball was underneath his chest/stomach. I don't know where you saw the ball in his legs.

 

on FOX

 

Guess you're watching a different FOX channel than the rest of the universe is.

 

To be fair, if the video showed conclusively that the Pats recovered, Belichick had every opportunity to challenge. The Giants didn't rush to the line and so the Patriots had plenty of time to look at the video upstairs, so they must not have thought it was conclusive.

Posted

 

To be fair, if the video showed conclusively that the Pats recovered, Belichick had every opportunity to challenge. The Giants didn't rush to the line and so the Patriots had plenty of time to look at the video upstairs, so they must not have thought it was conclusive.

 

I don't believe they can challenge in the last 2 min of the half, can they ?

Posted

 

To be fair, if the video showed conclusively that the Pats recovered, Belichick had every opportunity to challenge. The Giants didn't rush to the line and so the Patriots had plenty of time to look at the video upstairs, so they must not have thought it was conclusive.

 

I don't believe they can challenge in the last 2 min of the half, can they ?

 

We're talking about the fumble by the Giants which took place earlier in the half, not the one by Brady with less than 2 minutes remaining. But you're right, a team can't challenge a play in the final 2 minutes.

 

EDIT: The one on the botched handoff from Manning to Bradshaw in the Giants end of the field.

Posted

 

To be fair, if the video showed conclusively that the Pats recovered, Belichick had every opportunity to challenge. The Giants didn't rush to the line and so the Patriots had plenty of time to look at the video upstairs, so they must not have thought it was conclusive.

 

I don't believe they can challenge in the last 2 min of the half, can they ?

 

We're talking about the fumble by the Giants which took place earlier in the half, not the one by Brady with less than 2 minutes remaining. But you're right, a team can't challenge a play in the final 2 minutes.

 

:oops: never mind.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...