College Football - BCS Bowls

[wekse]

and here we go...sonofabitch.

[Magnetic Curses]

not a bad decision, but a bad throw. you can't overthrow that ball, you have to give cumberland a chance at that pass.

[Magnetic Curses]

that play would have resulted in 3 td's for usc if the situations were reversed.

[da bears]

for being so highly thought of in recruiting out of high school, im less than impressed with usc's receivers.

[Guest]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

[Guest]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

It's called injuries. USC is healthy now.

[Magnetic Curses]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

 

nope. that's called incidental contact when both players are going for the ball.

[wekse]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

 

you're wrong....the db was going for the football and had jumped the route...not really his fault he made a play on the ball.

[Butterscup1679666578]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

[Magnetic Curses]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

It's called injuries. USC is healthy now.

 

usc's not that good. they've gotten the benefit of a bunch of breaks. booty is an average qb. the only player that impresses me is mcknight.

[OleMissCub]

Joe McKnight is badass. They must have shacked him up with a chick who was an 8 instead of a 10 when he visited Ole Miss.... :-( Edited January 2, 2008 by OleMissCub

[Guest]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

 

nope. that's called incidental contact when both players are going for the ball.

 

DB bumps WR off his route. The bump prevents WR from catching the ball. That's PI. If it would have been the other way around - USC DB bumping an Illinois WR, you wouldn't be saying anything right now.

[Magnetic Curses]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

[Guest]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

It's called injuries. USC is healthy now.

 

usc's not that good. they've gotten the benefit of a bunch of breaks. booty is an average qb. the only player that impresses me is mcknight.

 

Right. USC sucks. :roll: You've got to be kidding me.

[wekse]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

 

nope. that's called incidental contact when both players are going for the ball.

 

DB bumps WR off his route. The bump prevents WR from catching the ball. That's PI. If it would have been the other way around - USC DB bumping an Illinois WR, you wouldn't be saying anything right now.

 

the only reason he was bumped is because the illinois player was going for the ball....a bs call that really screwed illinois.

Edited January 2, 2008 by wekse

[Butterscup1679666578]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

 

You know you don't deserve to be in this game so just get over yourself. Plus, I'd rather win the Cotton Bowl than get completely embarrassed in the Rose Bowl. See you in St. Louis.

[Magnetic Curses]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

 

nope. that's called incidental contact when both players are going for the ball.

 

DB bumps WR off his route. The bump prevents WR from catching the ball. That's PI. If it would have been the other way around - USC DB bumping an Illinois WR, you wouldn't be saying anything right now.

 

he didn't bump anyone off the route, they were both going for the ball and thomas was better at it.

 

i'm sure i'd be saying, "got away with one there".

[Magnetic Curses]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

It's called injuries. USC is healthy now.

 

usc's not that good. they've gotten the benefit of a bunch of breaks. booty is an average qb. the only player that impresses me is mcknight.

 

Right. USC sucks. :roll: You've got to be kidding me.

 

i never said that usc sucks.

 

i did say the west coast sucks, so eat it.

[wekse]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

 

You know you don't deserve to be in this game so just get over yourself. Plus, I'd rather win the Cotton Bowl than get completely embarrassed in the Rose Bowl. See you in St. Louis.

 

geeze man...bitter much? haha

[jaydee]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

 

You know you don't deserve to be in this game so just get over yourself. Plus, I'd rather win the Cotton Bowl than get completely embarrassed in the Rose Bowl. See you in St. Louis.

 

BCS Bowl > Non-BCS Bowl

[Magnetic Curses]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

 

You know you don't deserve to be in this game so just get over yourself. Plus, I'd rather win the Cotton Bowl than get completely embarrassed in the Rose Bowl. See you in St. Louis.

 

for which game, the game where the illini blow out a daniel-less tiger team or the annual braggin rights loss?

[Butterscup1679666578]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

 

You know you don't deserve to be in this game so just get over yourself. Plus, I'd rather win the Cotton Bowl than get completely embarrassed in the Rose Bowl. See you in St. Louis.

 

BCS Bowl > Non-BCS Bowl

 

Winning > Losing

[Butterscup1679666578]

Honest question: Are DBs in college not allowed to make a play on the ball? Sure there was contact, but he was just looking at the ball.

 

USC taunting again because of a fluke botched lateral that went for 55 yards.

 

 

especially pitiful considering they were supposed national championship favorites at the start of the season. but then again they did the same thing against michigan last year, so its not suprising. lose a few games in the regular season, win a meaningless bowl game, act like your king of the world

 

yes, the Rose Bowl is quite meaningless.

 

it's just a little less meaningless than the cotton bowl, though.

 

You know you don't deserve to be in this game so just get over yourself. Plus, I'd rather win the Cotton Bowl than get completely embarrassed in the Rose Bowl. See you in St. Louis.

 

for which game, the game where the illini blow out a daniel-less tiger team or the annual braggin rights loss?

 

Why are we Daniel-Less?

 

And we're talking basketball now? Interesting turn of events.

[da bears]

ahahahahahaha i am loving this right now. now just gotta hope for ku to get blown out. now go ahead illinois fans, bash the cotton bowl all you want! everyone knows who should be where.

[Guest]

don't both players have a right to the football when it is in the air? i'm probably wrong, but damn.

 

no, you're right, they do. that's a no-call. he wasn't trying to make contact, he was going for the ball and the usc player got in the way.

 

No, that's PI. The DB bumped the receiver and interfered with the receiver's ability to catch the ball. That's what is called pass interference.

 

nope. that's called incidental contact when both players are going for the ball.

 

DB bumps WR off his route. The bump prevents WR from catching the ball. That's PI. If it would have been the other way around - USC DB bumping an Illinois WR, you wouldn't be saying anything right now.

 

the only reason he was bumped is because the illinois player was going for the ball....a bs call that really screwed illinois.

 

It's still a bump - which you just admitted it was - and the referees are going to call that. Stop talking like Illinois got screwed over. They didn't.