Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Nobody thinks the most interesting information is the fact that he didn't throw with his left arm until he was 6?

 

I don't like how the author says Ted Lilly has "been decent". Sure his record is 2-2 but his ERA is still under three, he has been strikeout out a ton of batters, and he is not walking people or allowing many base hits.

 

I caught that too. Since when is a 2.82 ERA merely decent?

Since it was printed in an SI article.

 

You're talking about a publication whose writers still generally refer to pitchers' records as the end all be all in defining who is good and bad.

Exactly. SI holds less credibility with me than ESPN, and that's saying alot.

 

SI is the stodgy old school the only things that matter happened in the 1960's entity, while ESPN is the showy new school all style no substance, give me the next highlight and yell really loud behemoth.

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Nobody thinks the most interesting information is the fact that he didn't throw with his left arm until he was 6?

 

I don't like how the author says Ted Lilly has "been decent". Sure his record is 2-2 but his ERA is still under three, he has been strikeout out a ton of batters, and he is not walking people or allowing many base hits.

 

I caught that too. Since when is a 2.82 ERA merely decent?

Since it was printed in an SI article.

 

You're talking about a publication whose writers still generally refer to pitchers' records as the end all be all in defining who is good and bad.

Exactly. SI holds less credibility with me than ESPN, and that's saying alot.

 

SI is the stodgy old school the only things that matter happened in the 1960's entity, while ESPN is the showy new school all style no substance, give me the next highlight and yell really loud behemoth.

Ironically, you can catch Bill Walton calling games televised on ESPN, but you won't find him writing for SI. He's the exception to the rule.
Posted
SI is the stodgy old school the only things that matter happened in the 1960's entity, while ESPN is the showy new school all style no substance, give me the next highlight and yell really loud behemoth.
Ironically, you can catch Bill Walton calling games televised on ESPN, but you won't find him writing for SI. He's the exception to the rule.

 

To be fair, I'm not sure Walton is actually capable of coherent writing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...