Ah...possibly...but this is what threw me off - Yeah, I forgot that he had already retired in '94. Confusing. Anyway, what do you think the reaction would've been? I think he would have been elected sooner had he not come out of retirement. I remember hearing many in baseball have that same sentiment. But, on a purely selfish level, I'm glad he came back and played for 2 more years - it was 2 more years I was able to watch him...I thought he was great then so I can only imagine how great he was in his prime. During the induction, someone said that Sandberg got in simply based on his prime years because from 33 and on, his numbers weren't that great. So, had he stayed retired the first time, I believe he would have gotten in sooner. Though I believe he should have been inducted on his first ballot as did those announcing the induction on television. I also think Sandberg was kinda stuck between eras...though I'm not totally sure because I didn't watch baseball in the 80s. It seems to me, he was a doubles hitter who could do the little things and had speed but he turned into a HR hitter...just as the league eventually did. So, I guess I'm saying his playing time overlapped two different times - one in which bunting and running was important and one in which HR were important. I think he was a better overall hitter in the 80s than in the late 90s so maybe had he stopped playing in the early 90s that would have boded better for him to get into the Hall not only sooner, but also quicker in terms of tries on the ballot. But, all just my opinion - and a biased one at that!