Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bull

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    4,028
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bull

  1. there was. But now there's knot. :roll: Just the response I was looking for. :D
  2. Yeah, but that's the part of the equation we had right already. I think Pierre scores 100 with Lee and ARam 3&4, but I'm not sure its enough to make the offense great. As usual, this year depends on Wood and Prior. If Zambrano is the best starter, the season will not be a success.
  3. there was. But now there's knot.
  4. 1-800-NOODLES *stolen from Jehr in the nickname thread*
  5. Thread title change? Pierre gone after this year? KingKonan gone after this post? Am I missing something? Also, I don't want Pie leading off. That is not a role that he should have to fill during his career. He has shown throughout his minor league career that he is going to have a high walk rate. Granted, he can change that but it isn't very likely. If they aren't going to sign Pierre to an extension, I really don't understand the trade... Apparently I am. Thought the post was old and that he posted once and dissappeared. Welcome to the forum Konan.
  6. Pierre = Out-at-third-trying-to-stretch-a-double-into-a-triple. I know its long and awkward, but I think you'll be surprised how it catches on. The announcers will be using it on a regular basis.
  7. I personally think it was a good move for the Cardinals not to resign him. His velocity was way down and he started to come apart at the end of the year. Not saying he won't do good but in my opinion it's very risky for that many years and money. Morris comes apart at the end of every year.....he's had dead arm issues for quite some time. I think it was a good move not to resign him....on the flipside, they lose the option of Marquis as trade bait, and they have multiple holes that need to be addressed, and the free agent market this year isnt/hasnt helped them out. let the old man walk, get the draft pick and start Reyes. I don't see the Cards falling off as much as most people do this year.
  8. I'd like to see Guzman in the pen where he might stay healthy.
  9. That has always been my understanding. 2002 - $72 million 2004 - $83.2 2005 - $92.1 stl business journal
  10. Thread title change? Pierre gone after this year? KingKonan gone after this post?
  11. Some people bring something to the table, other don't. um.....he brings a lot more to the table than you do. play nice, boys
  12. No need to be realistic here, there's a whole other thread for that.
  13. I think there's very little chance we get both Huff and Bradley. Call me the pessimist, but I'm hoping against hope for one of Huff, Wilkerson or Bradley.
  14. Is this good for the Cardinals or bad? You'd have to think reyes could do better than a 4.11 era.
  15. Since Baltimore was nice enough to take our disgruntled super-star Sammy Sosa last year for Jerry Hairston, I think it only right that we should return the favor in kind. Tejada for Hairston straight up. :wink: 8) :D :lol: :? :oops:
  16. The concept of "not blocking Murton" is one I want to avoid. If you put Murton out there and he flops, you're looking at 400+ John Mabry plate appearances. Can we please be a deep team? Maybe just try it once? Join. Except Huff isn't exactly atop my wish list. If BWilk is in the fold, I'm still going after Bradley, Floyd, Mench, maybe RonDL before Huff. Of course, if taking Huff makes it easier to get Lugo.... Yep, sometimes you have to rob Peter to pay Paul. I still feel comfortable that there are some decent choices still out there. How long ago was it that TB wanted too much in return for Huff?
  17. Please don't exaggerate. I've told him that a million times. Aside from the fact that that comment is quite condescending, I dont think you have. I believe that was a joke - "I've told him that a million times." is exaggerating. True...I haven't even told him once.
  18. only with his permission. Now that his buddy furcal is elsewhere, he might be willing to leave...or not
  19. Please don't exaggerate. I've told him that a million times.
  20. Am I the only one here who still wants to see Murton get over 400 ABs?
  21. I think this may happen. Will Carroll thinks the Cubs are close to getting Bradley. Pierre, Bradley, Floyd with Murton in for Pierre against lefties. Someone had suggested this some time ago. I may be reading you wrong, but there's no way the Cubs traded for Pierre to platoon him.
  22. I'd rather hang onto patterson. A scenario where you keep him but don't have to depend on him is ideal. Outfield of Murton, Pierre, Floyd/Bradley/whomever with Patterson and Hairston on the bench is not too bad. Expensive bench player, but he still has tons of potential.
  23. ***WARNING: EXTREME UNDERSTATEMENT*** I think this move will turn out to be a good one. ***************************************
  24. With Guys currently on roster Pierre Cedeno Lee Aram Walker Murton CP Barrett Assuming CP and Walker go away Pierre Lugo Lee Aram Wilkerson Murton Cedeno Barrett
  25. will the Cubs get any compensation for this? Bradley please.
×
×
  • Create New...