I dunno, seems pretty straight-forward to me ... :blink: If batters hit just beyond second base, there was no foul ground, and only 2 bases in baseball, that wouldn't look too weird aside from the specific names Throw in the pitcher doesn't have to throw strikes (but it's hard to get the batter out if you don't), the batter doesn't have to swing (but it's hard to score runs if you don't), and you can choose not to run on ground balls, and that's about it. Oh, and throw in the fact that, unlike baseball, strategy is actually important and the batsmen really do have a wide variety of swings they can employ (the bowling's a lot more varied to. I don't think baseball fans really think about how little the difference is between an 85 mph slider and a 92 mph fastball in terms of the actual path and velocity of the ball). I prefer baseball because I grew up with it, but objectively, cricket > baseball.