Yeah I think they're definitely the two most complete teams. I don't think much support exists for this thesis. The Vikings have played one of the easiest schedules in the NFL -- the easiest in the entire NFL per Sagarin (the Colts have the twelfth most difficult). Their best win was a 2-point win against a 6-5 team, their loss a 10-point loss to another 6-5 team. Despite that, they've allowed 19 more points on the season than the Colts, and have only outscored their opponents by 19 more points total. Looking at advanced statistics, the Saints just jumped the Colts for No. 1 in team efficiency, with the Vikings ranked eighth (the Vikings are two spots ahead of the Colts in offense, but 12 spots behind in defense) (see http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/12/team-efficiency-rankings-week-13.html). I'm not entirely sure what the Vikings have done to distinguish themselves from the Colts. Edit: I totally forgot that the Packers are somehow 7-4, so those would be the Vikings best wins. That was not meant to be an intentional misrepresentation. I apologize for that. That's fair. Indy has certainly played a much tougher schedule. I'm probably just putting too much weight on their slow starts and the holes they've dug in the last month or so. The end results have been impressive.