Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Geographyhater8888

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,436

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Geographyhater8888

  1. Geographyhater8888
    I’m not sure his spray chart looks like on contact allowed but as a pitcher who generates a lot of fly balls, PCA would fetch a lot of the balls that Merrill couldn’t. Not quite sure how significant though.
  2. Geographyhater8888
    If they won’t pony up for cease then what would that mean regarding a potential extension for a Cabrera/Gore acquired in a trade? Another Tucker situation? They’ve shown no willingness to pay players on their terms.
  3. Geographyhater8888
    But who really is? There’s always a bidding war tax that teams have to pay, Cubs unwillingness to meet players on their preferred $ terms is why they have a rotation full of number 3-4 starters. His peripherals were very good, he’s durable and the Padres defense was 36 runs worse than the cubs.. Is there a reason why you think his velocity will dip, like an injury? Pitch counts keep arms fresh regardless of innings. If the Cubs refuse to shop for the Max Fried, Corbin Burnes type pitchers they’re better off with a capable number 2 starter than their current power in numbers approach in my opinion.
  4. Geographyhater8888
    You were right. I assumed BsR and Offense had separate run values. Offense - Batting and Base Running combined (above average)
  5. Geographyhater8888
    wRC+ doesn’t factor in base running. Offensive runs combine both offensive and base running runs. I assumed the categories were separate. Offense - Batting and Base Running combined (above average)
  6. Geographyhater8888
    You’re right. I assumed stolen bases only covered BrR.
  7. Geographyhater8888
    Can anyone explain to me how Busch had a 140 wRC+ and was worth 4.6 fewer offensive runs than Tucker with a 136 wRC+ and only 5 more plate appearances?
  8. Geographyhater8888
    Goldschmidt seems like the perfect fit as a platoon option at first base. I also wonder if they’ll slowly work Busch in towards facing left handed pitching this season.
  9. Geographyhater8888
    He needs to connect on deep passes and throws that require touch more than anything. It’s leaving points off the board and good defenses will exploit that weakness. If he ever cleans that up he’ll be able to get away with less than pin point throwing accuracy between the numbers to play at a high level.
  10. Geographyhater8888
    Bears would be unranked in the BCS despite their glamorous record.
  11. Geographyhater8888
    I’m fairly confident Ben Johnson has final say over roster and personnel decisions. 25th in DVOA checks out at the moment too. They’re a very good bad team at the moment that’s a product of schedule sequencing.
  12. Geographyhater8888
    Their wins feel more like they avoided losses than actual wins. Credit to the coaching staff for everything including taking the easy points unlike Dan Campbell in these narrow wins.
  13. Geographyhater8888
    My name definitely checks out with my bad navigational skills there. That was meant for you, yes.
  14. Geographyhater8888
    I said before the game McCarthy was their path to a win. He’s bad when he can grip the ball and unplayable with an injury to his throwing hand. He’s Caleb with only the negative traits.
  15. Geographyhater8888
    I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said. I’m wondering what his market will be. It’ll be more than the $20 million player option he turned down.
  16. Geographyhater8888
    Of the Bears last 8 wins, they’ve trailed with 2 minutes left in the fourth quarter in 6 of them
  17. Geographyhater8888
    Is this ugliest win this year? I vote yes.
  18. Geographyhater8888
    Tgeyre f Definitely defer.
  19. Geographyhater8888
    I haven’t had a sigh of relief watching the bears since they picked off Joe Milton in week 3.
  20. Geographyhater8888
    Poles QB1 vs Poles QB2.
  21. Geographyhater8888
    Can’t connect on passes with touch. The fastballs over the middle are dotted.
  22. Geographyhater8888
    Vikings are daring Caleb to beat them deep.
  23. Geographyhater8888
    The secondary is getting torched as expected.
  24. Geographyhater8888
    There’s many teams that aren’t clogged with number 3-4 starters and he’d have zero competition with his pedigree. His options aren’t constrained like a Collin Rae. I guess it all depends on the market for him. I’m not averse to the idea but I’d be extremely surprised if it happens.
  25. Geographyhater8888
    If they flip Cassie I’ll trust that they made the right call. Talent evaluation isn’t the issue with the front office. Reason having Woodruff would be odd is more so selling him the idea of joining a rotation where he’ll be fighting for rotation spots with 5 viable starters when Steele returns and he’ll command high AAV. He’ll likely win a spot if healthy though. For Cub standards I won’t complain.
×
×
  • Create New...