I understand that the Cubs just might not be able to resign Tucker if they trade for him. Things happen. He might prefer somewhere else. Might want to play closer to home. We might get “Cohen’ed” by somebody. Could be anything out of our control. That’s fine.
My issue would be the Cubs giving up a ton of assets with no intentions at all to be willing to step out of their comfort zone and give a 10/3-400M contract out. I just don’t see the point. Yes. It would be cool for one year… but that’s just not the kind of risks I think this team should be taking at this point. I get the arguments. I agree with the “just get the star player and then see what happens.” My whole point is you have to at least be willing to step up to the big boy table when the time comes. If he signs elsewhere, at least you can say you took a shot, offered fair market value, but just missed out. At least we tried. But giving up 3 years of Parades, multiple years of Ben Brown (?), and another elite prospect (Shaw/Smith), just for one year of Kyle Tucker on a .500 team with zero intentions of getting anywhere close to his asking price in free agency would be as dumb as giving up Seyia & Parades & Smith.
Trust me. I’m all aboard the acquiring Kyle Tucker train. I’ve refreshed Twitter constantly tonight hoping something breaks. Will watch it all day tomorrow. I just hope Jed isn’t stupid about this to try and save his job.