Batted ball data and expected stats are nice. I generally like those stats. But I also like actual results. Pete gets actual results. We have a 6 year sample size saying you’re getting around 40 home runs, 3+ fWAR, and a 120+ wRC+. I’ve already done it, but making a 1:1 comparison between Busch and Alonso isn’t exactly fair when one guy has like 3 months of MLB experience and the other has 6 years. We don’t know what Michael Busch is or isn’t. There’s not enough sample. And why does it have to be an either / or? Let’s put the 40 HR bat in the middle of the lineup and figure out the rest later. It likely comes down to one of Busch or Morel playing 3rd and the other DH. I know, I know “but defense,” fact is, there isn’t any better options. Then you’re left with figuring out PCA, Tauchman, and Busch. Play the guy that’s playing the best. Simple.