Yeah it’s not all perfect as you listed out. He’s still sitting at a pretty solid 114 wRC+. His larger sample at AA was 151. Regardless, he’s still producing even though some of his underlying numbers aren’t perfect, especially as he gets more comfortable in AAA. Sometimes players just out produce their peripherals and expected stats. Hendricks did it for years. It’s been the opposite with Morel all year. His underlying numbers have been good despite nothing to show for it. I think there’s a balance and in this analytical day and age we are in, it’s easy to get too caught up in some of these numbers.
I mean I’m a young guy. I’m 29. Thanks to 1908, I learned enough about analytics to be conversant (far from an expert), but I also try to find the balance personally. At the end of the day, your production is all that matters. Mo is producing at every level and this team could use a jolt in the lineup. I mean I guess if nobody cares whether we buy or sell or make the playoffs or don’t make the playoffs, then it doesn’t matter. I, for one, am sick of selling. Sick of losing. I’m about ready to see some of these guys come up and impact the big league club. I’m not trying to rush guys that aren’t ready, but Moises is built different than a lot of prospects. He has an advanced beyond his years approach. If he comes up and struggles, then okay. It’s not going to kill his development.
Im not meaning this to be argumentative with you at all. Just posting my standpoint on it. If he weren’t producing, then I would be more worried about some of the underlying numbers being slightly less ideal than preferred.