Im not gonna argue..
Most of these new age stats are based on would of, could of, and we'll just call it bad luck.
We all know the bottom line is the results and his results hasn't been all that great the last month or so despite these weird stats of would of, could of bad luck.
A handful of games of bad luck of some balls dropping here and there ok, but we're far pass that now.
So, we can leave this as we both have different views on a struggling player. You can go with the funky stats, ill stick with shows actual results.
I'll also add in that i doubt any GM looks at those type of stats when it comes to a FA or paying a guy over what their actual results were.