Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bertz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bertz

  1. I think they know they're going over a cliff after '25 and rather than try and thread the needle they're just saying screw it and maxing out the next two years. They're Dombrowskiing basically.
  2. YMMV on whether it matters with Jed in charge but talk has been they wanted to retain just one of Altuve/Bregman so the latter seems very likely to hit FA now
  3. This draft is also apparently insanely deep at WR. Matt Miller had 14 (!!) go in the top two rounds in his mock yesterday. Grabbing an LT at 9 and then trading back into the 2nd round (whether via Fields or otherwise) to grab a WR is not a very disappointing backup plan.
  4. Dodgers/Padres can start using the 60 Day IL this week, and other teams next week. Don't be surprised if there's a flurry of moves around then. For instance I believe the Cubs immediately 60 Day IL'd someone (Roberts?) and then signed Fulmer last year.
  5. I'm hoping that they have something lined up that they're simply waiting for Chapman/Bellinger to get locked in to execute on.
  6. Right, and the genesis of the conversation was why that's wasteful and they'll have to settle for pennies on the dollar for him sometime in the next 12 months.
  7. Even more broadly, unless there's an injury you can point to (or a change in repertoire for a pitcher) the endpoints game is meaningless 99% of the time.
  8. There's nothing especially eyebrow raising in what he did last year, if anything Statcast thinks he was a bit unlucky. The projections have him taking a step back from last year but not a huge one. If he were the guy we expected to start 140 games in CF he'd be worth worrying about more, but as a bridge to the kids (or contact oriented bench bat after we bring back Bellinger) he's really well suited.
  9. Expanding on this. Number of starting players from each Central team going into their age 24-30 season (not bothering to look at relievers): Cards (4) - Gorman, Nootbar, Edman, Donovan Brewers (7) - Contreras, Turang, Ortiz, Adames, Frelick, Peralta, Hall (?) Pirates (8) - Davis, Tellez, Cruz, Hayes, Reynolds, Suwinski, Keller, Ortiz Reds (10) - Stephenson, Candelario, McLain, Steer, Friedl, Benson, CES, Greene, Ashcraft, Abbott Cubs (10) - Busch, Hoerner, Swanson, Madrigal, Happ, Suzuki, Morel, Steele, Imanaga, Wicks (Bellinger would add another; Amaya overtaking Gomes would add another) Honestly looking at depth charts to compile this reinforces how cooked the Cards are. At least one of the Cubs/Reds/Brewers will get strong collective development from their kids and blow past them.
  10. I think this is the money quote right here, and why I'm not worried about the Cardinals. They have almost no prime age talent on their roster. It's Nootbar, Gorman, Edman, and a couple relievers. Everyone else is old or *very* young and inexperienced.
  11. Canario's got a tough path to playing time. Right now he's behind Happ, Suzuki, and Tauchman in the outfield, and Morel/Wisdom at DH. That’s not an impossible mix to worm his way into. But we know the team is adding at least one bat, with Bellinger or Chapman being likely. If it's Bellinger that adds a guy directly in front of Canario in the OF. If it's Chapman it doesn't directly impact him, however Jed failing to reel in a lefty will mean there's more incentive to get LHH bats into the lineup elsewhere, so Tauchman is probably the most days CF (especially with his pretty nominal platoon splits). Complicating things more is that it's not just the guys in front of him, it's the ones behind him. PCA is the org's golden child and is at roughly the same developmental level, probably a smidge behind. By mid season Owen Caissie is also likely to be competing for any non CF at bats Canario might be sniffing around for. If Canario was a more legit CF, or had a starker platoon split like, it'd be easier to see him carving a specific role on the MLB bench. But as is he seems likely to fill a Mastrobuoni type role of "first guy up from Ioea to be the last guy on the bench". If he wasn't going into his last option year that'd be a little wasteful but ultimately fine. As is his value drops like a stone the closer we get to November without him having proved definitively if he belongs in MLB.
  12. Yeah I think this puts it really well. I'd obviously love flashy trades for like Juan Soto, but honestly even Jed just putting his Dipoto hat on occasionally and making a couple more Velazquez for Cuas type trades I think is warranted. Like Canario is a great example. He seemingly has some value, he also seems very likely to be on the outside looking in for a consistent spot on the MLB roster. It's going to be really annoying next November when he's out of options and only has ~200 MLB at bats under his belt and they have to dump him for pennies on the dollar. Like you said an avoidable problem, and negates a lot of the value gained on the margins elsewhere.
  13. I think the safe assumption for the rest of the offseason is one of Bellinger/Chapman, an opportunistic ST-eve deal for another bat and/or reliever, and call it a day. Assuming that's correct, I think the above from Tommy is what will stick out most to me as a missed opportunity this winter. These are the prospect bats of note who will (likely) open the year at AA or AAA. Guys with *'s are already on the 40 man guys with +'s have to be added next winter PCA* Caissie+ Canario* Vazquez* Mervis* Davis* Murray+ Alcantara* Triantos Ballesteros Shaw McGeary Franklin+ Aliendo+ Pagan+ Only making one trade this winter, and having the currency in that deal be guys who were a million miles away, would feel like a waste. Like you don't even have to do anything crazy, even just turning one or two of the guys already on the 40 into their weight in relief help feels plenty productive.
  14. Is it? The Cubs payroll is $45M higher than the Royals right now and expectation is they'll end up with Bellinger pushing the gap to $70M.
  15. The Angels could make Rendon a more or less full time DH? Otherwise yeah it's seemingly Giants, Cubs, or mystery team. Like I could see the Tigers or Nats bringing him in a year too early as a "hey we're nearly back" kind of move.
  16. I liked the Lugo deal too. And obviously the Ragans trade was a homerun. Good on them for seemingly turning a corner and moving on from being the closest thing the AL has to the Rockies.
  17. After the Stripling trade wonder if the Giants are doing a a Boras pitcher + a lesser bat instead of just Chapman to finish their offseason.
  18. The mistake a lot of people make is adding all that talent to their 100 wins from last year. But they were very much not a 100 win team on November 1st. Hell they weren't really a 100 win team on October 1st, it wasn't that shocking when they got bodied by the Dbacks in the playoffs Their rotation was Bobby Miller, a rehabbing Walker Buehler, and a bunch of kids. Their outfield was James Outman, Chris Taylor, and probably Michael Busch. With Betts/Freeman/Smith and an army of talented kids they certainly weren't a bad team, but their win projection certainly started with an 8 instead of a 9 or a 1.
  19. Wonder of the Dodgers are bringing back Brasier. He was a reverse split guy after they brought him on and he added the cutter.
  20. Ah good catch! Just fixed it. Yeah it's tough. Like most years Longenhagen hasn't finished until damn near draft day, and those last half dozen lists are basically out of date the second they go live. But at the same time they are so much more thorough than any others (particularly for teams that ST in Arizona), so you don't want to look a gift horse in the mouth. I feel like they should do those "Imminent Big Leaguer" articles promptly at the start of the winter and then he can take his sweet time writing about lower levels and complex league miscellany.
  21. 18. PCA 26. Matt Shaw 28. Kevin Alcantara 49. Cade Horton 68. Michael Busch
  22. Brewers moving laterally takent-wise just to get older and add a 9 figure contract to their books?
  23. Bob Nightengale says Willy Adames is in fact available post Burnes trade. That would potentially be a twofer because it'd make the Brewers worse and depending on where he went take another Chapman suitor off the board.
  24. I would be very reticent to count on a guy becoming a FIP beater off of 90 innings, though adding a tumbling changeup would certainly be a way to make that happen. I think for me it's about the velo. In '22 Carl was a shade under 95 MPH and even if you give him zero credit for soft contact he had the peripherals of a worthwhile middle reliever. Last year he was under 94 MPH and of course ended the season on the IL with a shoulder injury. If he is healthy and can get back that MPH he lost between '22 and '23 I'd be happy to give him first crack at a spot in the pen. If not he's emergency depth that needs to get comfortable in Iowa IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...