If the new guy doesn't have any money to work with, how does Hendry have any money to work with? If it effectively comes down to that the only significant moves the Cubs can make are trades until the payroll can be expanded or contracts come off the table I'd rather just keep Hendry since trades have been the one thing he's largely tolerable to really good at getting done. Once the money situation is more workable go ahead and fire him, but until then it seems largely redundant. I'm not trying to get in the middle of a conversation, and I typically hate "addition by subtraction" & "slippery slope" arguments.... However, with that said, I see illiniguy's POV. I liken it to an argument I had w/ a buddy during Dusty's last year. Everyone knew he would be done. My opinion was that he should've been canned in-season. My buddy argued, "Why? What difference would it make?" Well, we saw the typical Dusty shenanigans; he wouldn't play the young guys, kept mis-using pitchers, etc. Keeping guys like Dusty/Hendry around absolutely could have a detrimental effect on the future. Allowing them to stay gives them more opportunity to make bad decisions. I'd rather take a chance on a new guy