Besides general business ethics, yes, the commissioner's office would most definitely get involved. Just to play devil's advocate, how would the commissioner's office know? If nothing came out to the press and this scenario happened, how would anybody know that it wasn't just Aramis wanting to return to Wrigley in 2007? They'll suspect something fishy. That Ramirez viods his contract, the Cubs make the excat same offer, and he pounces on it. That is very fishy. And any trade w/ the Dodgers needs to involve breaking Furcal's wrist. Again, say Ramirez voids his contract but in every interview he gives before (but after the season) he says he wants to return to the Cubs. Then say they offer him close to (not exactly) the same type of deal. If Ramirez says he wants to return to the team, and the Cubs say they want him to return, how is that fishy? That situation - maybe not the voiding of a contract part - has happened before. Player is on a losing team. Player gets traded to winning team at the deadline. Player returns to original team in the offseason. Obviously it doesn't happen all the time but it has happened before. Again, devil's advocate.