Jump to content
North Side Baseball

NorthsideAvenger

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    4,166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by NorthsideAvenger

  1. Pass whatever you were during that post, over here.
  2. Here would be my lineup in 2007 Lineup: CF: Pierre 2B: Durham (I think he would be perfect in the #2 slot) 1B: Lee RF: Sheffield 3B: ARam LF: Jones/Murton LF C: Barrett C SS: Izturis Rotation Zambrano Schimdt Prior Marshall Guzman LR: Marmol/Rusch (BIG FATTY is here in 2007,, unofrtunately) *Sheffield MIGHT be willing to switch to 1B this yr, but he won't be happy about it. I think he would leave NY to return to RF. *Ray Durham isn't the player he was even 5 yrs ago, but he doesn't have to be. Durham is a career .280/.350/.440 and would slot in very NICELY between Pierre and Lee. This would allow the Cubs to keep one less black hole out of the starting lineup, but Cedeno/Perez would be crappy bench.
  3. Like Vance, I could see the Cubs going after Vicente Padilla. But I could see the Cubs going after a guy like Ton Armas, or a Miguel Batista, or even (gulp) Jeff Suppan.
  4. I see SOME similarilites, but I don't think they are similar pitchers. Rich throws a little bit harder, and Sean has more pitchers in his arsenal, and they are more polished. With that said, it would ONLY against them, if they are put back-to-back in the rotation. If Hill and Marshall are separate by say....Guzman or Marmol, then I don't see how it would work against either.
  5. Why are people wasting their time and breathe on something they knew in their minds would happen. So why are people even surprise?
  6. Agreed. There is a REASON why Sarge Jr is playing for his 7th or 8th team in his ML career. Not bad of a 4th OF option or a backup plan, but I wouldn't make GMJ a target, per se.
  7. Terrance Long was a victim of racist comments in Cleveland a few yrs back while he was still in Oakland. And David Wells----while not racist, but still poor taste---was hassle by Cleveland fans by the loss of his mother the night before a BIG playoff game. So yeah, stupidity still is evident in pro sports.
  8. Personally, I think he did it more for the psyche of Hill and allow Hill to gain the confidence that HE CAN pitch at the major league level. Personally, allowing Hill to go 8 innings (especially the way he was throwing) was the absolute RIGHT call to make. Now let's see if Hill carries this confidence into the rest of the season. If he can...that is one less question having to be answered for 2007.
  9. What? Out of 50 players who have played shortstop this year, Ronny is dead last in offensive production (measured by VORP). Last. He can only improve, but what are his chances of becoming a "standout" at a position in which more offensive production is expected? The point is they don't care about offense. It's manly to talk tough on defense, whereas offense if for pretty boys. Tough teams defend, and there's no better market than Chicago to play up the defense concept, regardless of the sport, or the relative value of defense in that sport. the cubs should sign ben wallace. AND Ron Artest.
  10. I'd take a flier on Choi. He can't be worse then Mabry or Nevin. And he is a better defensive player then both.
  11. I actually like the move to 2b for Cedeno. For some reason it's look like to me that Cedeno would often take his OFFENSE to the defense, and his DEFENSE to his offense. IMO, by moving him to SS, I think we might, i said MIGHT, see a more relax Cedeno, and perhaps a more confident Cedeno, knowing he could play a easier position.
  12. Actually, Tiger......I think a better comparasion would be Omar Vizquel. Omar wasn't exactly "hot stuff" with the bat as an offensive player, but once he got to Cleveland he became a very solid player. Now granted, for his stay in Cleveland, he played with both Alomar's, Belle, Thome, Ramirez, Sorrento, Lofton, Fryman, Baerga....so with that kind of offensive talent around, Omar could relaz and play his game. Now if the Cubs could land a big bat or two (Depedning on ARam), maybe Izturis could be the next Vizquel, (I'm not holding my breathe) and relax and become the player everybody thought he would be before his injury. With that said....Cedeno/Izturis NEEDS to talk to Gywnn about hitting, and taking pitches, in the worst of ways.
  13. I just don't agree. Rogers is their ace. He will likely get beat by every other ace on an AL playoff team. The Tigers are a very good team, but Bonderman is their best pitcher, Rogers isn't an "ace" and Verlander has never gone this deep in a season. And Jones isn't exactly lights out at the end of the game. Depending on how the teams shake out, they could lose in the first round. No he's not. He maybe listed as the #1 on their depth chart, but come GAME 1 of the ALDS, my money is on Jeremy Bonderman as "The Man" for Detroit, followed by Rogers then Verlander.
  14. downey also calls izturis a "beauty" and a "gem." he also says a shortstop like this doesn't come along every day and that the trade was "one of the Cubs' smartest manuvers of the century." wow. Then again, EVEN I could have turn the double in the game. It didn't have to take a GG to turn it, AGon simply lost focus for a split second, and turn a routine DP (I believe he should had won the GG that yr, anyways, and had not committed an error in the playoffs, I beileve). So that reasoning by Downey is beyond FLAWED. It wasn't as if it was a difficult play to make. None the less his "one of the smartest manuvers of the century" is completely bogus. I won't EVER---oustside of this thread---put the acquistion of Izturis in the same sentence as the Lee and Ramirez. I don't know what kind of bonus the Trib paid Downey to write that column, but it is completely bogus.
  15. As long as Isiah Thomas keeps running the Knicks... The fact that the Cubs are mention in the same sentence with the current Knicks.....is a testament to how bad the Cubs really are.
  16. Why would Ramirez want to be back next yr, when it will be just Lee, himself and Barrett as the "main offensive players." If he's back, Pierre would still be moderate, the Cubs won't get anything out of Izturis (if they wanted another light hitting MI whose last name is Izturis, they could had gotten Macier from LAA for a AAA pitcher) or Cedeno, and Jacques is moderate. Again...why should ARam want to return to the Cubs next season? :-k Oh, the Cubs are going to be SO BAAAAAADDD next r, and Hendry is going to think it is a "fluke."
  17. And the beat goes on... And so does the World Series drought. But hey....we got TRIPLETS on the Cubs..... :D to :(
  18. I'm willing to bet the well will run dry at this point :wink: You know what they say, "Alls well that ends well." 8)
  19. Aint going to happen. This is strictly PR by the Marlins trying to convince what liitle fans they do have, that they are trying to compete.
  20. Why would the Mets do this? Do they need an extra pinch hitter off the bench? Heilman as a pitcher is much better then Maqruis, and I believe is CHEAPER...No sense in GIVING the Cards the better pitcher, for a free agent to be.
  21. I think the chances are the Mets are more likely to land Schmidt, then Oswalt. Reported reason for the breakdown in the Milledge for Zito talk..........
  22. I know he went in as a Cardinal (WE CUBS FAN know who he REALLY belongs to), and I know he has the Cubs mention on his plaque....but to me, and the Cubs fans in Alabama, that know, Bruce Sutter will ALWAYS be Cub. We recognize what he did for the Cardinals, but he will ALWAYS be a Cub first or foremost. Thank you for the memories, Bruce.
  23. First: Santana isn't a prospect, and he WOULD definately slide behind Zambrano and perhaps Prior (if healthy) in the rotation. The kid will be a stud. Aybar (I rather have Kendrick or Wood), I don't know. The cUBS would have to get back a player like McPherson (who they COULD flip to another team for a 3rd baseman, say....Cabrera? Second: Only way I would be not be pissed about trading ARam, is that in the offseason...Hendry makes a strong bid (if not flat out get him) for Miguel Cabrera. Outside of that, I am not in favor of trading ARam.
  24. Belliard is PISSED OFF about going to a contender from a team 23 games out? Just wow :shock: . I take it, Belliard really loved Cleveland, or is it he hates St. Louis?
  25. The Cubs actually have a winning record against the NL central. It's games against the other NL divisions(and interleague) that are a problem. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) Maybe Baker forgot to tell his players that there were other teams besides the NL Centra. D'uh.
×
×
  • Create New...