I'm not remembering that one, what was it? Hendry was rumored to be going after both Lilly and Meche at the same time last offseason. When he lost out on Meche, he went for Marquis (as I remember it).
I really wish we had just gotten Meche. And I wasn't all against the move when it was rumored, either. I actually liked his upside. I wasn't really excited about it, but I wanted it to happen.
Um, no, sorry. Skin color has nothing to do with it. No, really, it doesn't. "Gritty" (usually white, fast, high-effort & smallish) players do tend to get a lot of fan-love.
It's not unheard of, but it's rare for a guy to come up at that age and perform well. The greats do it, but not many others. Orlando Cabrera hit .280/.325/.414 in his first substantial exposure to major league pitching at 23. But at 24 and 25 he hit: .254/.293/.403 .237/.279/.393 Before turning it up in his late 20's and becoming what I would assume people would call an above average major league shortstop. The bolded sparked my interest. Is it really that crazy to think that Theriot could put up the numbers that Cabrera has in most years (aside from his one fluke year in 2003)? Granted, defensively Cabrera wins, but it just got me thinking.
do you recall that the cubs went into the last weekend of 2007 without having the division locked up? we won 85 games and took the back door into the playoffs because milwaukee crapped the bed at the end of the year. they have a lot of good young players, and might be a few games better this year. losing a game or two because of poor personnel decisions could cost the cubs a spot in the playoffs. Floor and ceiling talk is nonsensical. It's meaningless scoutspeak and has no place in a rational baseball discussion. If either one or both of those two are playing poorly they should be replaced. It doesn't matter if its .290 OBP vs. 270 OBP or whatever numbers one wants to use. This just isn't true. There most certainly is such a thing as a ceiling and a floor. When projecting a player's production, there has to be some range within which you can reasonably expect that player to perform. Unless you think attempting to project performance and making decisions based on said projections has no place in rational baseball discussion, that is.
do you recall that the cubs went into the last weekend of 2007 without having the division locked up? we won 85 games and took the back door into the playoffs because milwaukee crapped the bed at the end of the year. they have a lot of good young players, and might be a few games better this year. losing a game or two because of poor personnel decisions could cost the cubs a spot in the playoffs. You're exactly right. And losing a handful of games in the first 2 months (or more than that over the course of the year) b/c we have Theriot's .330 OBP in the top spot is going to be a real issue in September. That is, unless we play Cedeno, hit him 8th and he puts up a .750 OPS b/c he's not as terrible now as he was when he was 23. I might be wrong here, but I really don't think any lineup order problem (even having your worst hitter at the top) could cause a team to lose a "handful" of games in two months. Maybe a handful over the course of the season.
I can come pretty close. I set up some boxes once at about that height (after i saw those videos), just knicked them with my shoe. I can also touch an 8' ceiling with my elbow (I'm 5'7"). /bragging about my short-guy hops
Hell, let's not understate it. A "lazy" 1.000 OPS is better than a "gritty" .999 OPS. Plus, that lazy guy has some leftover potential/ceiling to do better than that 1.000 OPS since he's doggin' it sometimes. :thumbsup:
only if The Macarena and Mambo No. 5 are taken You took the words right out of my mouth. I know some of them have been jokes, but a lot of people (both here and in the comments of that blog) have had some horrific choices for closer songs.