-
Posts
38,769 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
70
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Transmogrified Tiger
-
Cubs payroll blueprint tool - please give advice
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Brock Beauchamp's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Interesting! Some immediate thoughts from clicking around for a minute: Since the Luxury Tax payroll number is the most relevant to the Cubs situation, I don't think there's a need to break out Gomes salary v. buyout. Treating him like you did Hendricks(who also has a buyout) would be preferable Similarly, having a way to account for non-26 man pre-arb salaries and non-payroll LT expenses(even as a combined line item) would help make the actual and budget number more relevant to how folks will use this in a comparative sense. Fangraphs' payroll pages (which assume additional pre-arb salaries adding up to 33 total roster spots to account for roster churn/IL time) handle this pretty well. Barnhart and Bote have dead money for 2024, 3.25 and 3 million respectively from a LT perspective This may be part of the unfinished bits but having the ability to add dead money values would be useful to visualize money paid in/out as part of trades(you could technically do this with the acquisition's salary but IMO the dead money value is clearer) There's a couple super nitpicky things about the default roster(looks like you're using MLBTR arb values but Wisdom's is 2.6, Nico's LT number is 11.67, Heuer is technically arb eligible and will probably be a hair over the minimum if kept) but nothing that an individual couldn't "fix" themselves if they cared about it -
Yoshinobu Yamamoto to...the Dodgers? Really? Again?
Transmogrified Tiger replied to UMFan83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
There's also some very limited but promising Stuff+ data on Imanaga. For me the question with him is two fold. One is what is the velo in reality? I'm seeing 91-94 and sits 94. Even with the promising fastball characteristics I don't think a guy with Stroman velo is worth going out of the way for unless there's other changes different from what we expect(e.g. both Stroman and Hendricks are gone). The other is that he was pretty home run prone for a good Japanese league starter. Maybe given the repertoire and strike throwing abilities you can sequence your way to a better outcome on that front? But still, it's a concern. -
Cubs Outright Estrada, Burdi, and Young
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bertz's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Wonder if there's any meaning in who wasn't chosen. In particular I'm thinking of Roberts, since he hasn't pitched in 18 months and would probably have cleared waivers fine. -
I guess for me the question is less on if he can make that progress at Iowa v. MLB(I'm open to the argument that it could be either), it's that on a team with competitive aspirations I think until those adjustments happen PCA is going to be unplayable at the MLB level. The 7 K in 19 MLB PA is one indication on that front, but moreso it's the 30% K rate with barely above league average production at Iowa that points me to that development needing to start at AAA. That said, I totally understand Tauchman skepticism, though it'll be interesting to see how the offseason progresses if other alternatives present themselves. Bringing back Bellinger, adding Soto and being willing to play Happ there in the short term, adding a lower tier FA or trade target, telling Morel he's a full-time OF and playing him there, etc. Very possible that even though I assume the front office is fine with Tauchman being a stop gap, there's probably permutations where it's not exclusively PCA v. Tauchman in April.
-
Don't want to distract from the Little conversation(just a few more strikes and he could be elite, he can afford to live in the zone more since his baseline is so unhittable), but I'm very much against PCA making the opening day roster. I see his September call up not as a trial run to prepare him to be ready from Day 1(though that may have been on the table), but one borne out of competitive necessity and ended up being a call up before he was ready. He still has hurdles to climb at AAA to not get humiliated at the MLB level like he did this year, and even if Bellinger or another CF isn't acquired they'll clearly be fine starting with Tauchman there to let PCA get the reps that he needs.
-
I would gently suggest you just say the opinions you think and respond to the specific things people say, and spend less time and words worrying about the 'narrative' or arguing against a nebulous prevailing opinion you think you're seeing. When you focus on the latter everything veers into being a screed that is difficult to parse and understand, much less interact with.
-
No one thinks Soto and Ohtani will command the same money in a long term deal. Any convergence towards towards that point is a function of Soto being significantly younger and not a conspiracy to not recognize how good Ohtani is.
-
General Baseball Chit-Chat Thread
Transmogrified Tiger replied to David's topic in General Baseball Talk
-
Hoyer signed 5 different free agents to multi-year deals last year alone(7 players total if you want to count the multi-year extensions given to Nico and Happ). About a quarter of the current roster are on 3+ year guaranteed deals signed by Jed. The idea that he's artificially limiting himself to the bottom of the barrel since they don't require multi-year deals isn't backed by objective reality.
-
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Morel has been in the Cubs organization for 7 years and played more 3B than any other position as a professional. He has been extremely, unplayably error prone at 3B(1300 pro innings) and SS(800 innings) while being better at 2B(600 innings.) I get that he's not played all that much there at the MLB level, but they are not flying blind if they make a call on his defensive home, especially as it relates to 3B. -
If some team is really enamored with Amaya in trade talks, I wouldn't hate trading him and adding McGuire.
-
Yoshinobu Yamamoto to...the Dodgers? Really? Again?
Transmogrified Tiger replied to UMFan83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I don't want to be too pedantic but 7/203 (29M AAV) is extremely different than 6/240 (40M AAV)! Or said another way, for the purposes in which most of us are discussing the offseason and finances(luxury tax implications), the posting fee is irrelevant and you wouldn't want to include it as part of a hypothetical years/dollars that we typically are tossing around. It exists and it's good to remember in considering how high a team might go, but once YY signs it's borderline meaningless for fan purposes. -
There is maybe an outcome in an offseason that already includes e.g. trading for Soto along with signing Hoskins and Yamamoto where I can squint and see it making sense with Mateo. But mostly I think I prefer to roll with Madrigal if we're not investing in the position. It doesn't look like there's a huge delta in their defensive value at 3B, I'd expect Madrigal to be a more capable hitter(while Mateo underperforms his contact, even his xWOBA puts him at like an 85 wRC+ max for his MLB career), and while Mateo's base stealing is intriguing, Madrigal is not a slouch in that department either.
- 4 replies
-
- jorge mateo
- mike tauchman
- (and 3 more)
-
Minor League Musings
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Little Slide Rooter's topic in Cubs Minor League Talk
Really interesting Fangraphs interview with Luke Little: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/cubs-prospect-luke-little-is-a-large-southpaw-with-low-slot-sweep/ -
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Would very much disagree with this. Every season will have a handful of players who underperform, that's variance and not a solvable problem. The Cubs return over 10 players who on a full season basis were in the 1.5+ fWAR range last year, plus a Top 25 prospect in PCA and some additional depth who they may want to give another chance to(Canario, Mervis). They are not in a position to try to paper value over a larger number of roster spots, they're in a position where there are a maximum of 3 open lineup spots they need to maximize impact from. And more to the point, what do you think the marginal cost of a win is if you think 33 million for Soto 'arguably still has some surplus'? It's a bit over 20 million in surplus, which if we consult a 3rd party source like BBTV is coincidentally the surplus we'd expect from Morel over his team control. -
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
The rumors that the Padres are going to be slashing payroll and that Soto is the likely move have originated in San Diego and been around since the trade deadline, regardless of where he would be going. The Yankees showed up as a potential destination in rumors before the Cubs the last few days. This is not a PR or Cubs-inspired phenomenon. -
Not sure if Mizzou will be better or even as good as last year(they were abnormally good in close games including 2 buzzer beating 3s), but it should be fun continuing to have them play watchable basketball. With recruiting ticking up(it'll slip a bit but 247 has them with the 2nd ranked class atm) a year around the bubble would be fine with me especially given that this looks like the deepest the SEC has been in a while and last year was way ahead of schedule for Gates' first year in the program.
-
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
This is an arbitrary framing that doesn't really mean anything. Did Jed go all in on 2023? He spent 17 million on a 1 year reclamation project, signed multiple relievers to 1 year deals, and added multiple mid-30s guys to 2 year deals. Plus at the deadline he traded for a rental. The answer is he didn't by any real definition of the phrase, and by the same token trading away an averageish pre-arb major leaguer for a star isn't making a huge sacrifice in 2025 and beyond either even if he only has a draft pick and a bunch of spending money to show a year from now. Yes, it's a more competitively aggressive move than trading for someone with multiple years of team control or signing a player long term. Those options have tradeoffs too, trades having a higher player cost and paying FAs for post-prime/unproductive years. For all 3 we cannot make our perfect option in the lab and acquire them, we have to see what's actually available, and in this particular offseason there are not many alternatives to the impact that Soto would provide. I'm very open to other options, I don't *love* the treadmill of having to replace various players annually, and paying Soto his money will create more narrow paths with other acquisitions. But that doesn't mean that it's foolish or out of character to pursue him because of the caliber of player he is. -
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
If you don’t make a move for an elite player unless it is maximally efficient, you will not acquire those players and struggle to make the leap unless you do something extremely uncommon through the farm. We can’t choose the exact shape of that player, and there is an opportunity cost to waiting given the window they’ve created for the next 3 years. The Cubs have built their roster to the point where they have enough depth and few enough holes that they will get more benefit from one 5 win player instead of two 3 win players. They have a number of the latter and it’s easier to stumble into the latter. They have an extremely deep farm system that you can expect to have a steady flow of the latter in the future. Soto being a terrible defender would be a lot more relevant if the team didn’t already have a number of good defenders and well rounded profiles. They are very well set up to take on Soto’s “lopsided” value since he doesn’t have to field and he provides a lineup anchor they cannot find elsewhere unless you want to pay an even higher cost for Ohtani. -
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
The Cubs had the run differential of a 90 win team, and Soto is a cut above offensively anyone they have or can reasonably acquire(save for Ohtani). 2024 matters and while they shouldn't sell the farm for a slew of rentals, they should take advantage of opportunities to get rare players even if they aren't maximally efficient. Morel is an average to slightly above average player whose best positions have multi-year solutions on the roster(unless you think it's DH, in which case Morel is not really above average). Would it be better to trade Morel for a star player you have for longer term? Sure. Is that player out there, especially at 3B? That is far less clear, especially for the caliber of bat that Soto provides. -
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Counting stats can help us here, let's take wRC (not wRC+, just the cumulative value) as an example. Last year: Soto: 708 PA, 131 wRC Bellinger: 556 PA, 92 wRC Morel: 429 PA, 63 wRC Wisdom: 302 PA, 40 wRC Madrigal: 294 PA, 30 wRC This shows us that from an offensive perspective, Soto is so good that the other player in the tandem only needs to be as good as fringe roster guys in order to match. Plus this comparison includes an offensive level from Bellinger that we aren't really expecting to repeat, and obviously the goal will be to shoot higher than Madrigal/Wisdom with the other starting spot in this scenario. Yes there's a defensive consideration, but since we're talking about bottom of the defensive spectrum(and poor defenders at that) aside from Bellinger's CF(which we'd expect elite defense from via PCA for a chunk of the season anyway), that impact is muted. If you want to say it's not worth it for potentially one year of Soto that's one thing(I'd disagree but I get it), but if you want the best possible team in 2024 then given the roster and financial circumstances I think it points pretty clearly to Soto. -
Cubs Interested in Juan Soto?
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Brock Beauchamp's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Some of those teams don't have a Morel caliber piece to offer in trade(Yankees and Mets for starters), others are not going to be spending big dollars on a bat over pitching(Cardinals, Phillies), some are less likely to pay a Morel-sized price for a potential 30 million dollar rental(Twins, Astros), and others still may be investing more time and energy in the pursuit of Ohtani(Dodgers, Mariners). Again, the takeaway is not that the only reasonable outcome is Soto going to the Cubs for Morel, but rather that the practical reality of the situation is that something centered around Morel is much closer to the best offer that gets put forward than it might appear. Fit is going to make a bigger difference than the average sell trade because the Padres are not giving up on competing for the next several years and prioritizing prospects(which would make the return more fungible across teams). -
Cubs Interested in Juan Soto?
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Brock Beauchamp's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I do not want to go too far in the direction of saying that Morel is a special flower, but I think this overstates how many teams have a player with his characteristics(pre-arb, proven standard of production, some optimism for improvement) that isn't an untradeable cornerstone, along with having the money to pay Soto plus the need to prioritize him over other additions, and being in a competitive cycle where they'd give that player up for potentially one year of him. -
Good stuff, I really like Naylor as a trade target, his name has caught my eye a few times in scanning for potential bats. On top of what you mentioned he also has only played for one org, which I always think of as a small bonus in an acquisition because it makes it a small bit more likely different/varied instruction may unlock something new in him. The problem I've run into with any Guardians trade targets is that I'm not sure what they are/what they want to be, so while I don't doubt the Cubs could be the winner for Naylor's services if he's made available, I struggle to come to a 'this is a realistic package that meets their needs' point because they have a deep system and are never at the extreme ends of the competitive spectrum.
- 9 replies
-
- josh naylor
- hayden wesneski
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Going somewhere, Soto? Yes, to the Yankees
Transmogrified Tiger replied to Bobson Dugnutt's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
That's fair, and it's definitely conspicuous how little they've let Morel play 3B. The one caveat I'd give is that that you could just as easily use Morel in a different trade(like for a SP) to help get to where you want to go. So even if you think Morel's future on the Cubs roster is doomed by his lack of defensive quality, there's still an inefficiency to sending him off to get a star bat that you have to pay 30+ million to (and for potentially only one year at that). I'm not saying I wouldn't do it, there's only 2 hitters of Soto quality likely available and the other carries a higher cost than 30ish million + Morel, but Morel's pre-arb quality has enough value that I'm not gonna rush to say 'sold, who cares, get lost Chris' in reacting to that possibility.

