raw

Chuck Pagano officially axed. Pa-gone-no?

In some cases, I think we may be looking at multiples.... Trade for Machado, sign Reed, plus a cheap starter to compete with Monty Trade for Archer, sign Reed, replenish what we lost in trade Trade for Yelich, sign Cobb, replace traded parts Sign Cobb and Reed Sign Yu and be done I think these are kind of our general options. Yelich/Cobb seems like the best option of those IMO. Love Machado. Love Archer. But Yelich and Cobb under control for 4 years + potential to go after Harper >>>

I just want Mitch to finish with: 60% completions - currently at 59.9% More TDs than INTs - currently 7 of each A QB rating higher than Wentz's rookie year- 79.3 for Wentz, Trubisky at 78.5

So based on the current NFL catch rule. If a player makes a diving catch on 40 and does the worm all the way to the end zone, and drops the ball after crossing the goalline but before standing up or handing it to an official, that would be an incomplete pass.

The hell is with this IU team. Hang with then #1 Duke, Louisville on the road, @ Seton Hall. Beat #15 ND just 2 days ago. But just lost their 2nd home game by more than 20 points against an in-state team that's not Purdue or Butler.

This should be a fun way to spend Christmas eve! The Browns actually are a pretty good run defense. But they allow teams to do whatever they want passing the ball. Not exactly the Bears strength, but Mitch will have his chances. Josh Gordon could be a tough matchup for the Bears, but Kizer is an absolute mess at QB. He's only had 2 games where he didn't throw a pick, and that was because his coaching staff saved him from himself, and he also threw 0 TDs in those 2 games. So, if he throws the ball around a lot, the Bears are probably going to get a turnover or 2. Throw in that the Browns have allowed (I believe) the most sacks, and there's potential for more turnovers. I think the Bears win this one, but I wouldn't bet on them beating the spread. I think Trubisky gets his first multi-TD game. Bears win 27-24.

Is this a "The Bears shouldn't have fired Lovie" take? Because that's not a good take. Not at all. Just pointing out that the Bears have been bad for 25 years, and that even includes a 9-year stint of decent football.

Best for them to not have a double digit lead in the 2nd half against the Hoosiers.

It'd be really hard to continue watching, if that happened. Be the easiest decision I ever made to stop watching this team and probably football in general.

25 seasons since Ditka was fired. 10 seasons with 10 or more losses (4 in a row) 5 seasons with playoff berths 3 of those playoff seasons and just 1 of those double digit loss seasons (his 1st season) came under Lovie Smith.

I don't get it. Who is getting 2 full weeks off? I didn't include week 17 because they already don't do week 7 games. Every team that doesn't play on Thursday would get 2 full weeks off.....the way they do now during BYE weeks. 32 teams. 2 teams per game. So you'd need 16 Thursday games to make every team have the same BYE length. But since you can't have BYES the first 2 weeks and the last handful are too late in the year for a bye, you'd have some teams that don't get scheduled on TNF. Those teams would still need a BYE.......where they'd be getting 2 weeks off, because they are not playing a Thursday game.

Been saying this for years. The only issue I see is that's not enough Thursdays for every team to have a Thursday game. Thus, some teams would get a full 2 weeks off, while others get 10 days on either side of a Thursday night game. Not sure who would be losing out here. 17 weeks of the season. But you take out Week 1, because that's not a BYE. Take out weeks 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17. Thanksgiving though, you can keep the current format. Cowboys and Lions stay with traditions but now always get pre-Thanksgiving byes. Then throw in a 3rd game at night, and you have 6 teams on bye then. So, that's 10 games in 8 weeks, but 32 teams.

He didn't even have accuracy problems today. 12-for-15 and at least one of the three incompletes was a drop. I might have missed a play here and there, but the only inaccurate throw I can remember was the one on the "free play" when there was a penalty and he tried to force in an 8-yard curl. That's also the only bad decision I really remember. It's hard to give him a full evaluation when he only throws 15 passes, but this was the best he's looked so far. Mitch was great today outside of the fumbled snap. And you're right, 1 bad decision and it didn't count. He did have another inaccurate throw for 1 of his incompletions, but I got no complaints about Mitch today. Definitely wasn't the problem. It's pretty amazing, the Bears finished today (if you take out the QB scrambles) 15 passes and 15 run plays. So, they actually called 22 passes (4 scrambles, 2 sacks, 1 fumbled snap). Yet somehow, Mitch was only 2-3 passing on 1st down, with one of those coming on a throwaway play on the last play of the first half. Take out the fumbled snap and a scramble, and Loggains again called 5 passing plays of the 14 first down plays. On those 9 runs, the Bears averaged 2.8 yards per carry. Of those 26 yards on 1st down runs by the RB, 1 was 14 yards. The other 8 runs got 12 total yards. So, the Bears were already behind the 8 ball (the 8 1/2 yards to go ball) when they let Trubisky throw.

I know it's great for fans to get a true champion, but at that point you're talking about kids playing a 16-game season (Ohio St has played 12 reg season, 1 conf championship game, this would potentially add a play-in game, semifinal, and championship game) for free. That's pretty ridiculous. Do we get a true champion the only undefeated team left doesn't have a prayer at the playoffs? Yes.

I know it's great for fans to get a true champion, but at that point you're talking about kids playing a 16-game season (Ohio St has played 12 reg season, 1 conf championship game, this would potentially add a play-in game, semifinal, and championship game) for free. That's pretty ridiculous. The two teams who advance to the FCS championship generally play 15 games, and many of those players are only on partial scholarships. Ok? That's also ridiculous.

I know it's great for fans to get a true champion, but at that point you're talking about kids playing a 16-game season (Ohio St has played 12 reg season, 1 conf championship game, this would potentially add a play-in game, semifinal, and championship game) for free. That's pretty ridiculous.

where were we with him last year? what was he looking for? I'm so out of the loop with NFL contracts anymore I'm no sure if any solid sources had reported a number, but I'm pretty sure many in the media quoted that exact number as a good expectation. He was looking for 13Mil per. No idea what the Bears offered per year, but they offered him a 4-year deal. I can only assume it was over 11M per, but less than 13M.

Eagles sign Alshon Jeffery to a 4-year, $52Mil extension with 27 million guaranteed.

1. Matt LaFleur 2. John DeFilippo 3. Matt Patricia 4. Matt Nagy 5. Pete Carmichael Jr. So, basically.....hire a Matt. I'm skeptical of Carmichael. I've read he doesn't really have the personality to be an NFL HC. And I hate the thought of Pace trying to mimic the Saints to a tee. They are an OK franchise to model themselves after, but it's going to be hard to duplicate that success without Payton/Brees. And it's hard to say how much success is due to Carmichael. I wish he had some history of success without Payton and/or Brees. Not interested in guys like Jim Bob Cooter or Jim Schwartz. Would have hope with McDaniels, Gruden, or Harbaugh, but wouldn't be all that excited, despite them being big names. The latter 2 aren't likely anyway. Frank Reich is interesting, but is 55 and part of his appeal is if DeFilippo comes with, even if only for a year or two. Shurmur is interesting, but 52. Rather stay under 48 or so.

While I agree with all of this, "2 losses by 7+" is pretty disingenious. One by 7, one by 8, both 1 score losses where they had a chance to win with the ball late. "Chance to win" should go on fox's tombstone. It's a meaningless construct when you don't actually ever win. Agreed. And that wasn't what I was trying to say. But I do feel like a better coach would win over half of the close games. Close games are typically more luck based than anything, but IMO many of these games are only close because the Bears miss opportunities early in games, get conservative in the middle of games, and don't have the talent or scheme to do what it takes to get a GW score or make a game saving stop.

While I agree with all of this, "2 losses by 7+" is pretty disingenious. One by 7, one by 8, both 1 score losses where they had a chance to win with the ball late.

This is really good. Solak does really good draft work too. Whereas Pedersen's comments on Mitch included a lot of fluff, this is an unbiased breakdown of things Trubisky does well, and does not and how it compares to Wentz as a rookie.

Agree with your side rant. I guess the logic is, "hey this team went 4-12 vs. a tougher schedule, if they had an easier schedule, they probably would a couple more wins". But it does seem like double punishment. That being said, I think the Bears are going to win a couple more games. Not expecting it, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears finish 4-2. I think the Bears offense is potentially going in the right direction with Trubisky and possibly more if Fox decides he doesn't care anymore and stops his conservative gameplanning. The defense is headed the other way with injuries and players coming back to earth (Fuller). But I still feel like they can feed off of the offense, emotion, whatever. With that being said, this is an ass whooping waiting to happen. The Bears have next to 0 shot vs. the Eagles.

Man, Wentz finished with a QB rating in the mid 70s. He really tanked the 2nd half of last year. Now MVP conversation.

I think a reason for that is him learning how to take the snap under center and drop back and plant his feet before throwing. He’s used to shotgun 95% of the time and that’s a whole different rhythm to throwing. Once he gets more comfortable dropping back I think his accuracy goes up. You heard the announcers today point out several times which foot he was planting before throwing. That said I haven’t seen many perfectly placed throws (Though I might be remembering poorly) You’d hope to see more flashes of that. Beyond the mechanics of the dropback, I think he isn't processing D's fast enough to set his feet and make accurate throws. Eh. I think that was the case early on, but he's been a lot better the last 2 weeks (since the bye). And perfect placement is the quite the bar to set for Mitch in 6 games. He's made plenty of really good throws in tight windows (all the ones to Shaheen today for example) to some pretty shitty receivers.