The players union gave Sammy the OK to release his records. Why not just to it and end all the speculation? The standard is and should be higher for high profile athletes. This is his chance to develop some good will with the HOF voters. Look what happened to McGwire after his ridiculous performance under oath before Congress. He didn't admit using steroids but in the eye of the HOF voters, by dodging the questions, he might as well have. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2864613 Well the HOF is a popularity vote, so that's another story. I could refuse to vote for Sosa because I didn't like his haircut if I was a HOF voter and so inclined. We don't even know if Sosa's medical records would contain any enlightening information anyway. And if there's something else in there that is personal and he doesn't want to disclose, then that's a perfectly good reason to withhold the information. So if he does in fact choose to withhold the records it doesn't mean squat, period. You don't have a vote and I seriously doubt if any the voters that do would use the criteria you suggest. Medical records are released all the time with portions blacked out that are irrelevant to the pertinent facts. If Sammy has nothing to hide regarding steroids, he should release his records. I said that to make a point. Sorry it went over your head. And no, personal medical records are NEVER just released without express permission of the patient. You may wish to look up more information on HIPAA: private medical records are private. None of this changes the fact that if Sosa has, say, herpes and wants to keep it private he'd be revealing that very embarrassing fact just to "prove" a negative -- which can't be proven anyway. Medical records won't prove a damn thing. Every person on the planet has something or another that doesn't show up in their medical record, including drug use in some cases.