My take on the situation is that I have no problem w/Hendry getting two more years, 4 years is too short of a timeframe to evaluate his work. The Cubs didn't change philosophies or overhaul the system, but they lacked an identity at the major league level. Hendry has helped shape the identity getting Lee (likely inked), Ramirez, and hopefully Barrett, Murton, and Cedeno ecome long-term options as well. After the next two years, we'll have a better idea if Hendry is capable of building an annual favorite. With that said, if the Cubs avg. 85 wins from now till the end of the contract, it's time for a new GM. In short, Hendry's short time as GM deserves a couple more years rather than his previous work, b/c I still don't know if he is or isn't good enough yet. To comment whether or not Hendry is the best out there so we should keep him, insults future GMs with plenty of potential like Moore in ATL and Antonetti in Cleveland. Both are young bright candidates that will likely have successful tenures as GM. That's the same as being content with Jones b/c Giles wasn't leaving SD, there were better and cheaper options avail. for Hendry and you can say the same for Pierre.