Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    93,900
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. Start it in the 3rd inning. Let the first few innings dictate the title. Isnt that what happened today and now it looks silly? Lol
  2. Schedule appears to be very tough. Even if it’s Dalton the offense will be better but the defense is a little worse. I say 9 wins with Fields taking over midway through the season
  3. Bears take a... RB? Khalil Herbert from Virginia Tech Guess we are in BPA mode
  4. This. Plus even at his best he has tended to go on prolonged slumps. Don’t get me wrong, I would 100% support a KB extension. I may shed a tear of happiness if he was extended but I believe despite what he’s said before he wants to test the market, and the market will probably overpay him. At that point the concerns about his ability to torpedo entire seasons with nagging injuries put at least a little risk in a long term mega deal. But again if the Cubs went ahead and did that I would not complain
  5. Are the Bears the first team to not take a single pick from their designated position? 1-20 was traded to Giants 2-20 was traded to Panthers 3-20 was traded to Panthers 4-20 was traded to Vikings 5-20 was traded to Giants 6-20 was traded to Panthers 7-20 was traded to Raiders
  6. Strange give other perceived needs but you can never have enough olinemen
  7. It's crazy the disparity of picks at this point. Almost through the 4th round and the Cowboys for example have made 7 picks (the first 6 defensive) while the Bears have made 2. That said, the Bears 2 picks are by many accounts extremely impactful and will alter the franchise for a decade
  8. 4 of the previous 6 hitters walked. Obviously different pitchers involved but I’m sure the Cubs figured the only way they could score runs was to stand there and hope to draw walks
  9. Cubs non-Bryant runs were scored on a groundout, infield single, sac fly and walk. Bryant runs were on a HR and double. Bet he can’t wait to get away from these losers
  10. Dude it’s the Cubs. All signs point towards meekly striking out
  11. FO doesn’t love the Jenkins pick as much as most
  12. Seems like maybe signing a bunch of soft tossing mediocrity is not the way to build a good rotation.
  13. I feel like the Reds could sign Joey Votto to a 1 day contract in like 2047 and he’d still mash a 440+ foot HR against the Cubs
  14. I mean, you get a fresh set of picks every draft so yes, it is sustainable. Just feel like if you are consistently drafting less year over year than your opponents you’d better hit on a high percentage of your picks. But at the same time, I love Jenkins. I saw mocks that had the Bears taking him at 20. We get him and a franchise QB
  15. Is it possible to be both angry and happy at a pick at the same time? Love the pick but come on you can’t trade up multiple times every draft lol. It’s not sustainable
  16. Some interesting pre-draft stuff from a 49ers blog about Fields: https://www.ninersnation.com/2021/4/29/22408286/film-room-breaking-down-justin-fields Theres some really good film breakdown of Fields going through progressions etc
  17. I almost want to get in on that +6000 TE option. Pace loves him some 2nd round TE action
  18. will he wear #1? yeah i believe the Bears twitter account said he would wear #1 Edit: Found it
  19. I can't stop reading about Fields/the Bears today. This is the most excited I've been about sports in awhile outside of college basketball.
  20. Hey maybe you can branch out and create a separate forum just for the Bears if you are feeling ambitious.
  21. I want to believe Believe baby. The only downside is they disappoint you, which... Hey were well practiced in that art. Sadly thats how I feel but its true. If he sucks, oh well throw him on the pile of failed QBs. Hard to build a winning franchise when you make one 1st round pick in 4 years and that pick is a bust, but oh well. The upside is worth it
  22. Andy Dalton after hearing that:
  23. Another interesting thought I had about the Bears fortunes. Maybe they find a trade partner besides the Giants and still get Fields, but for the Giants to trade that pick they had to have Philly trade up with Dallas of all teams to take Devonta Smith, who everyone widely believed the Giants were going to take. Maybe if Philly doesn't get Smith they are willing to trade their pick to the Bears, or maybe Dallas is willing to trade 10 to the Bears if Philly wasn't trying to move up. But its still interesting the chain of events that led to the Giants pick being available. I honestly think the Pats were after Mac Jones all along and would have taken him even if Fields was on the board, so I'm not sure if there were any legit threats between 11-15 that would have taken Fields, but I guess its possible a team like the Saints would have traded up if he dropped much farther than 11.
  24. I've read several defenses of that and I've actually seen a scouting report that listed pre-snap reads as a strength of his ...you never know until he gets on the field. I am certainly a little concerned that if this is an issue, I definitely don't trust the Bears to coach it out of him. But I was genuinely surprised they didnt pick Jones when I found out the Bears traded up since he seems to be the opposite. Lacks things that Fields is good at but the consensus seems to be that he is really good at reading the field and going through progressions. After the Mitch disaster I figured they'd go for a safe pick. I'm personally happy they took Fields, definitely the higher ceiling and more explosive playmaking ability. But there have been many QBs that have all the tools and then struggle to pick up the mental side of the game. Defenses are going to be faster, schemes are likely going to be more complex. FWIW Watson's scouting report listed weaknesses with "Field Vision" and "reading progressions". Dak Prescott's were "can be confused with complex defensive schemes" and "makes poor decisions". Josh Allen also had the "makes poor decisions" label. Not quite the same as pre-snap reads but in a similar category of the mental side of QBing. We'll see Herbert had the same “issue” coming out. And not everyone agrees that he’s a one read QB (read the whole article - it’s great and drops a comp to a bigger Russell Wilson): I'm definitely going to read an article that has a headline of "The Chicago Bears pulled off one of the biggest steals in the modern draft era by trading up for QB Justin Fields"
×
×
  • Create New...