UMFan83
-
Posts
94,553 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
67
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by UMFan83
-
Single Game Tickets (Pre-sale info page 2, after the silliness)
UMFan83 replied to CubinNY's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I know, I googled it too after I called. It wasn't up there last week, so I called this morning. Believe what you want. [tweet] [/tweet] this was tweeted last week This has been on the tickets tab from the cubs website http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/ticketing/index.jsp?c_id=chc http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/chc/images/ticketing/y2016/320x325_chc_sgt16.jpg His AOL dial up subscription takes too long to load fancy images or tweets. If it ain't in text, he's rushing to his phone. -
Single Game Tickets (Pre-sale info page 2, after the silliness)
UMFan83 replied to CubinNY's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Really? You called Wrigley Field for this information? With a phone? http://media.mnn.com/assets/images/2015/07/hulton-archive.jpg.653x0_q80_crop-smart.jpg -
And using 2014 as their reasoning.
-
Things the Hawks are not good at: outdoor games Things the Hawks are good at: everything else
-
2 wins any way will do it. I don't know. Wins over Northwester and someone like Penn State in BTT would leave me very nervous. At that point they could be looking at an RPI around 60, SOS in the 70s and a 3-11 record against the RPI top 100. I don't know too many at large teams that get in with 3 top 100 wins. Of course i tend to be annoying pessimistic at times so maybe I'm wrong
-
Agghhh if we won that we'd likely make the tournament. As it is I think UM has to win 2 more and a BTT game to feel relatively safe.
-
we're gonna hold you to that
-
Take FWIW [tweet] [/tweet]
-
I've been out of the loop for several years, I will jump back in
-
All Things Spring Training 2016 (except games)
UMFan83 replied to David's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
which of those groups does jake go in I think hes an intermediary. Not quite in the same age range as the younger guys, but not really old enough to be an old guy. Going to make a blanket statement and say because hes from Texas he has some redneck in him, but he's too cool to be lumped in with those guys. -
All Things Spring Training 2016 (except games)
UMFan83 replied to David's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I love how they all get along. Well there's 2 factions...the young guys and the old red necks, but even they both seem to co-mingle quite well. -
Even if this is the plan, why not trade him now and then sign him again in the offseason? I'm guessing his cap hold is low, so bird rights basically. They can sign another FA and then Pau if he wanted to sign here.
-
If Pau chose to spend the twilight of his career on a middling Bulls team..... Edit: sort of beaten
-
They seem to be perfectly content being in NBA hell for the foreseeable future. That's the only explanation I can come up with. It makes no sense to me. Resigning Gasol for $20m a year or whatever is being rumored makes no sense to me. As does keeping Gasol in a lost season and not getting anything for him. I don't care if its for a future fringe rotation player or a underperforming young player with upside like MacLemore just get something. A FO that was known for stockpiling assets and planning well in advance is now running a shitty team with few assets into the ground.
-
I have absolutely no idea what the Bulls are doing. Can anyone even begin to understand the Bulls short and long term strategy here? I am completely perplexed.
-
omg that would be awesome
-
[tweet] [/tweet]
-
How many times have you watched playoff highlights this winter?
UMFan83 replied to UMFan83's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
Do it, it's fun. I catch nuances I missed the first time because I was hyperventilating during the first go around. -
I can't be the only one that frequently finds myself rewatching chunks of the (good) playoff games.
-
The worst part was, they would occasionally show replays from the normal camera angle, which is just a giant tease. A brutal game made more brutal by the presentation.
-
This is the worst thing I've ever seen. I cannot imagine how someone thought this was a good idea.
-
Jerod Mayo is the latest early retiree
-
All that does is make a gimmick which 3-3 really is even more important than it should be. The only thing close to fair is, 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for some sort of OT/ shootout win, 1 point for some sort of OT/loss loss and 0 for a regulation loss. Meh, I'd rather have 3-on-3 than a shootout or 5-on-5 OT. If it was a 5 minute 5-on-5 OT, most games would get decided in ties. While I am fine with ties, I want to limit the number of ties overall. Again, I don't think there is even a chance for a consensus on this, everyone has their own opinion on how it should be.
-
I like the tie instead of the shootout. I'd like to see 3 points for a regulation win, 2 for an OT win, 1 for an OT loss, and one each for a tie if nobody scores in the 3 on 3 OT. That way teams that play for the tie are sacrificing points, not gaining them. I don't like the idea of loser points. I've heard people theorize that the reason they don't go with the 3-2-1 system is that they don't want to inflate the number of points a team can win in a season. It would be interesting to see how that would affect the standings. I agree, no loser points. I know everyone has different takes on this and most hate ties, but I am fine with them. My ideal state: 60 minutes of hockey, winner gets 2 points, loser gets 0. If tied after 60, 5 minutes of 3-on-3, winner gets 2 points, loser gets 0. If tied after OT, its a tie and both teams get a point.
-
