I don't see the need to assume that would be it for the offseason, but it's not like Hendry has been brilliant in the offseason anyway. His best attribute is probably in the trading game. Giving him money to burn doesn't really guarantee anything. No, it doesn't, but it does give him the flexibility to upgrade the position that actually needs upgrading. And Hendry has really been one of the better GM's in the league at signing guys to big deals (9-10 million+ per year). He has a good track record of that...it's the middle deals (2-7 million) that have mostly hurt him over the years. Plus, the Cubs are going to need a cheap player or two to slot in around the diamond over the next couple years if they plan to maintain their roster, and taking away from that pool for yet another high priced player is extremely risky. The thing is, Harden and Gregg are the only free agents making any money after this season. I love me some Rich Harden, but I think(and would assume most would agree) that Peavy will be worth his contract more than Harden worth his next one. I guess if the economy stinks next offseason, Harden could wind up a bargain, but I really don't see a lot of holes for the Cubs to plug this offseason. Obviously it's a long ways away and a million things will happen before then, but I don't see why you'd hold off on acquiring Jake Peavy based on future offseasons. His contract is pretty damn big, but it's not something a big market team can't handle. ETA: That pargagraph is a jumbled mess. I understand that re-signing Harden and Gregg aren't the only options, I guess what I'm getting at, is there isn't a lot of places to upgrade in the offseason. Some bullpen help isn't a lot to ask out of an offseason.