Yeah, there's no real way to justify that ranking. I'm thinking Callis is paying way too much attention to that cup of coffee. I'm much more comfortable with trusting NSBB's top 30 list than I am BA at this point. Take a step back for a moment. I think Vitters should be a few notches higher, inside the top 20 ... but ... The comments seem to suggest that .275/20 HR is perhaps on the high end of projections for him (may be reading too much into a snippet, but it sounds that way). If that's the high end ... how much value is that? A corner IF (and let's face it, as much as I've defended his glovework at 3rd as passable if the bat played, he really shouldn't be there in an ideal situation) without high average ability and without plus power is ... not that useful, particularly if he has to go to first. If that's the high end, and he ends up being consistently less than that ... then ... 25 might be high. Again, I'm not saying I buy the projections, but if that's what they are hearing on the high end, I can understand the ranking. I think they were a bit harsh on some guys (Vitters/Torreyes come to mind) and a bit generous on some (SNTS/pedigree on Blackburn still has me scratching my head at that high a spot ... surprised on some of the back end guys ... actually fairly surprised that Hatley got a mention, along with Golden at 31, and of course, Loux/Loosen/Castillo are all guys where I could probably find other guys and make competitive arguments that they could be swapped out ... think they went high on pen arms) ... but I don't know if Vitters at 25 is something that really makes me aghast at their rankings. I think he should be higher, but ceiling only counts for so much at a certain point, and if the expectations they are hearing aren't that great ... well, I can understand it somewhat. Now, getting back to Vitters, the question is, do any of us expect him to be consistently more than a .275ish average and 20 HR's guy if all went well? If so, then there's a clear case for him to be higher. The power seems a tick higher than I am really expecting as a positive case right now. Average ... I could see him a tick higher perhaps. .275ish would have been good for 10th in all of MLB last year for 3B that qualified, 20HR would have tied him for 9th in MLB. If scouts think he's capable of that, after the AAA season he had, he should be much higher. .275ish with 20ish HR would make for a very valuable 3B even with below average defense as most of the league is struggling to find even replacement level production at 3B. So yes he should be higher.