Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Derwood

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    87,651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    80

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Derwood

  1. http://a550.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/46/m_5886f43115bc1e34632feb7eed3756f5.jpg
  2. yes, I believe a court decision made it that way
  3. yep, had PSU gone undefeated in 2005, they probably would ahve been shut out of the NC game
  4. so glad this isn't happening to the Cubs
  5. Agreed. If they tried to be creative, it could work. using the bowls as a playoff wouldn't change the financial situation Again, are you sure about the money dropoff? I doubt that it would be huge myself. I believe that if the NCAA sanctioned a playoff, that the money would work the same as the NCAA basketball tournament. In other words, instead of the individual schools getting multi-million dollar paydays, all money from the playoffs would be equally distributed amongst EVERY NCAA school.
  6. Agreed. If they tried to be creative, it could work. using the bowls as a playoff wouldn't change the financial situation
  7. yes, if only because it would be the 6th or 7th time Penn State will have gone undefeated in their history (with only 2 NC's to show for it)
  8. the drop in $$ for the universities is pretty significant if a playoff is instituted
  9. Tradition + money = No Playoff
  10. This is extremely true and I really doubt any of the three make it through without at least one more loss each. The original question, though, was IF all three did win out, who should go to the title game. should or will? If one of the reasons for no playoff is to preserve the sanctity of the regular season, then you have to take the undefeated team(s), right? If Penn State wins out, they should be in. If Penn State has one-loss, they should not get picked over a 1-loss Florida and 1-loss Texas team (if they lose) I tend to think Penn State would go if unbeaten (and it could definitely be justified), but it's also justifiable that Florida would be more deserving - given that they might have three better wins than Penn State would. One of the two teams would feel screwed, which is the reason for the desire for a playoff system. the only people who desire the playoff system are the fans, media, and maybe 1/2 the coaches. The universities and NCAA want nothing to do with it.
  11. This is extremely true and I really doubt any of the three make it through without at least one more loss each. The original question, though, was IF all three did win out, who should go to the title game. should or will? If one of the reasons for no playoff is to preserve the sanctity of the regular season, then you have to take the undefeated team(s), right? If Penn State wins out, they should be in. If Penn State has one-loss, they should not get picked over a 1-loss Florida and 1-loss Texas team (if they lose)
  12. USC needs a ton of help
  13. Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. No guarantee Florida, Texas OR Penn State get though without a loss (or two)
  14. badnews just PM'd me his top 10 list, and he really nailed it. just kidding, still waiting
  15. I'm not sure. Before the Cubs, the national media used the playoff failures by the Red Sox to play up the long history of falling short. Since the Red Sox won in 2004, the whole "umpteenth year without a WS" has fallen squarely on the shoulders of Cubs . This wasn't a big issue to the Cubs in 1984 or 89. As a matter of fact both years the media used 1969 as the indicator of how long it's been since the Cubs were that good. So how'd the Red Sox win it in '04 with that on their shoulders. They "Cowboyed up" and had Jesus playing CF
  16. so the Dodgers, Rays, Red Sox and Phillies didn't have the same pressure?
  17. I won't dismiss this as a possibility after Jimbo landed Harden (which I thought was a complete pipe dream in June)
  18. still waiting on badnews' list of 10 AL players more deserving than hamilton
  19. thats kind of a dumb comparison really dumb no, tossing aside stats that don't support your case (under the pretense that one doesn't understand the formula) is really dumb using stats incorrectly to support your case is also really dumb (re: OPS+) even though i'm on your side of it, it was a pretty bad analogy... not my best
  20. thats kind of a dumb comparison really dumb no, tossing aside stats that don't support your case (under the pretense that one doesn't understand the formula) is really dumb using stats incorrectly to support your case is also really dumb (re: OPS+)
  21. do you not believe in jet planes because you don't understand how they work?
  22. so it's not even an upset. even better
  23. I'm calling the Michigan St. over Ohio St. upset right now, though at this point, I don't think it's too far of a stretch
  24. um, duh, they are marcels I don't know enough about marcels to know that this is a "duh" observation
×
×
  • Create New...