Jump to content
North Side Baseball

abuck1220

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by abuck1220

  1. this is the lester/pearl jam thread. go start a thread about how framing a pitch properly is the equivalent of hitting 7 home runs if you and the rest of the hipsters want to talk about chvrches or whatever.
  2. i saw them play it in order live in moline. i'll tell you how awesome it was if you give me lester's FIL's number.
  3. realize i'm jinxing iowa st here, but wow do gissell and Woodbury suck. and gissell ALWAYS has the ball at the end. without fail.
  4. boy i think ethically he would be prohibited from doing that and i don't think you should encourage him.
  5. and how
  6. yeah, all this talk about how much the cubs FO cares about pitch framing led me to searching for any comments they have made about it, and I couldn't find any.
  7. oh well if you think it's silly then nevermind.
  8. http://www.statcorner.com/CatcherReport.php yeah if you buy all that,sure. or if you just buy that montero is really, really good at it and castillo is really, really bad you can believe those two things and still not think its worth __ runs/wins/$.
  9. http://www.statcorner.com/CatcherReport.php yeah if you buy all that,sure.
  10. that's crazy money for martin, but they better just push all that $ into the pile they have waiting for lester.
  11. he and niang are going to allow each other to score 40 points.
  12. to actually say this, you have to be: a) a complete skeptic of the effect pitch framing can have b) totally unaware at the discrepancy which exists between the two players statcorner: 2014 2013 2012 total Martin +11 +17 +24 52 Castillo -24 -17 -5 -46 Baseball Prospectus: 2014 2013 2012 total Martin +19 +15 +23 57 Castillo -10 -16 -3 -29source: http://www.statcorner.com/CatcherReport.php http://www.baseballprospectus.com/sortable/index.php?cid=1667331 so, i'm really curious to hear which it is...because it's not unfathomable (to me) to believe that an event on which they have influence about 7,000-10,000 times could really add up to a significant effect, especially when scouting sources universally agree they're at opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of ability it's simply impossible for me to hand-wave a factor that could alone likely amount to a 2-3 win difference and it's impossible for me to just accept that pitch framing alone amounts to a 2-3 win difference.
  13. yes, that's obviously my concern. he was pretty blah from ages 26-29, and the concern is he'll be even blah-er from ages 32-36. which isn't some crazy leap to make.
  14. who cares. that doesn't mean you have to give russell martin $75 mil.
  15. Your definition of kinda sucks, kinda sucks. Over half the MLB kinda sucks if you put Martin in that group. but half of mlb doesn't make $15 mil/yr. fine. but I'm not sure that's worth $75 mil.
  16. man, I am usually all about signing ALL the free agents, but I can't believe you guys want to give $75 mil to a 32 year old catcher that has kinda sucked 5 of the last 6 seasons because he's good at catching the ball. craziness.
  17. Catchers have worse aging curves than any other player. I hope the Cubs stay far, far away. Pay a coach $100,000/year to teach Wellington to frame, if it's that important. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/catcher-aging-is-a-curve-not-a-cliff/ And I understand your inclination to write off pitch framing as nebulous sorcery. I really do. But when you consistently grade out as really terrible by everyone who evaluates such things, something is probably pretty wrong unless you think there's some sort of Welington Castillo conspiracy among these guys. I don't doubt that he's terrible at it, I just doubt it's worth 25 runs a year or whatever.
  18. well if questioning that the difference between montero and castillo's ability to catch a ball is 50 runs per season counts as skepticism, I guess i'm skeptical.
  19. so pitch framing is going to be the thing smart people swear is undervalued this offseason, huh? that's kinda boring.
  20. I wish there was a way I could properly express how little I care about the football game between these teams in comparison to the basketball game between these two teams. I would gladly accept a 49-0 loss this weekend if it somehow gave iowa st 1 additional point in the basketball game.
  21. A&M is certainly a dumpster fire right now, but Tennessee is definitely a team on the rise. Regardless of whether they are that good or not, you are still having to play against and get pushed around by very high caliber athletes for 5 straight weeks. Replace Tenn and aTm with Big 10 teams like Illinois and Minnesota and it's not the same. Illinois and Minnesota, between them, have 2 four-star players they've recruited in the past 3 years and 0 five-stars. On the contrary, Tennessee and aTM, in the same three year span, have 63 four-star players and 6 five-stars. This isn't an SEC rah-rah post, it's just the truth when you objectively look at the numbers. You aren't playing the same type of athletes when you play a Minnesota as you are when you are playing a Tennessee. well at least now i don't feel bad for ole miss after last night anymore
  22. well that's [expletive] bonkers. no way he gets McCann money.
×
×
  • Create New...