Jump to content
North Side Baseball

abuck1220

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,737

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by abuck1220

  1. abuck1220
    detroit's good pitching didn't shut down st. louis' good hitting. Well game 1 Verlander gave up 6 runs and they lost. Game 2 Rogers pitched good and they won. Game 3 they gave up 3 runs and Carp gave up 0 and the Cards won, game 4 they got some bad breaks gave up 3 runs and lost. And game 5 again bad breaks and gave up 2 runs and lost. So they pitched OK in the W.S., but the cards pitched better and guess what, the better pitching won. ugh...this is such after-the-fact analysis that i can't believe you don't see the flaw in your logic. let's take last night's game -- verlander vs. weaver. verlander is clearly the better pitcher, so going in you (using your pitching beats hitting philosophy) would say the tigers should win since they have the better pitcher. then weaver outpitches verlander and you say 'well, good pitching beats good hitting' and weaver pitched better than verlander. i don't see how anyone can subscribe to this idiotic 'good pitching beats good hitting' mantra and then cite the 2006 world series, in which the team with the team with the BEST PITCHING IN ALL OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL got beat by a team with the 16TH BEST PITCHING IN ALL OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL.
  2. abuck1220
    detroit's good pitching didn't shut down st. louis' good hitting.
  3. abuck1220
    look at the last few w.s. champs: 2000: nyy (posada, jeter, williams) 2001: ariz (gonzalez, sanders, grace) 2002: anaheim (glaus, salmon, anderson) 2003: florida (lee, lowell, pudge, castillo) 2004: boston (ortiz, manny, damon) 2005: chicago (dye, konerko, iguchi) 2006: st louis (pujols, edmonds, rolen) hitting wins in the postseason, plain and simple.
  4. abuck1220
    so then the tigers should have won because they had the best pitching in baseball.
  5. abuck1220
    i think it shows that the tigers' hitting sucks (b/c the cardinals' pitching isn't very good). therefore, instead of saying the cardinals' pitching won, i'm gonna say the tigers' offense lost. more bats, please!
  6. abuck1220
    Agreed, the last thing I am worried about is Aramis signing now. Larger, fish are ready to be caught. Let's go get a stud bat and a stud pitcher and play in late October come 07. if the cubs lose ramirez, adding one stud bat (who will undoubtedly be less of a stud than ramirez) and one stud pitcher will get them nowhere close to october.
  7. abuck1220
    I'm counting Hill as a 5 possibly 4 until he proves he can pitch as well as he did at the end of 2006. didn't he prove he can pitch as well as he did at the end of 2006 at the end of 2006?
  8. abuck1220
    i hope everyone knows that if the cardinals win the world series, hendry's going after every guy on this list. but probably only the ones that suck.
  9. abuck1220
    defense wins championships!
  10. abuck1220
    ok, how does a white guy (the white guy, actually) only get to 2nd on that? detroit needs some pfp's.
  11. abuck1220
    If he's signed as the fourth outfielder, that's not as much of a problem. He's still a guy that can put up a great average and still give you a decent amount of HR's a year. I'm sure a starting job will be open to him somewhere. You may be right. But then again, if we offered him more money to be the 4th OF than another team offered him to start, would he take the extra cash for the limited role. My guess is most NL teams will be worried about his age and durability in the field and won't pay him big bucks for that reason. So, it would have to be an AL team with an opening at DH that signs him. I can see Cleveland, Detroit, and Texas...maybe Minnesota. How large of a contract will those teams offer? I can see the Cubs topping what those teams will offer even if they are planning on using him in a more limited role. I really see the Astros most likely to try to get him. I dont see any of those teams signing Alou. Why would anyone in their right mind sign a injury prone 41yr old to a $7 million contract? exactly. so why do you keep saying he's going to get a 7 mil contract? you seem to seem to be simultaneously saying that no one's going to give it to him, but that is what it will take to get him.
  12. abuck1220
    yay bunts!
  13. abuck1220
    I think he brings more than enough with the bat, as a platoon partner, to offset his bad knees and baserunning gaffes. Alou/Jones would be a tremendously productive platoon. Unfortunately, they are two guys who probably would balk at sitting while a kid like Murton gets to play. i think i'd rather trade jones, bring in geoff jenkins, and semi-platoon him with a guy like restovich. from strictly a production standpoint, jones + alou >>>>> jenkins + restovich.
  14. abuck1220
    and how far did that 'strength' take the cubs last year? I never understood the concept of turning a strength into a weakness. That strength didnt take the Cubs too far last year, because eveything else about the Cubs was a complete joke. exactly. in order to fix the million weaknesses on the team, you may have to give up some of your 'strength,' which, by the way, wasn't that strong at all.
  15. abuck1220
    and how far did that 'strength' take the cubs last year?
  16. abuck1220
    from the suntimes
  17. abuck1220
    intangibles, baby.
  18. abuck1220
    great stuff.
  19. abuck1220
    it seems pretty obvious that he was trying to cheat. of course, i don't know how he thought he could get away with it...that moron mccarver saw it within ten minutes. it was also pretty clear that larussa was being told about it in the dugout during the 1st. larussa screwed up by not going out there then. he should have known that if he knew the cameras had caught it, then the tigers would know too.
  20. abuck1220
    then again, i forgot how sensitive buck is...
  21. abuck1220
    Well, to be fair to Buck, it is a pretty disgusting act. and i'm sure he thought the same thing about taverez's half wool, half pine tar hat.
  22. abuck1220
    joe buck's about to freaking cry about it. can announcers protest a game?
  23. abuck1220
    if you're down by one, then maybe you bunt...but not down by two. you'd need a basehit either way.
  24. abuck1220
    that should be the cubs' slogan.
  25. abuck1220
    that lineup is terrible. It's not supposed to contend in '07. Thanks for your constructive and articulate insight though. :) well, i guess i'm just not too keen on a team with $115 mil payroll going through a rebuilding phase...especially when you have relatively young talent like prior, lee, ramirez, barrett, zambrano, etc. i suppose i just disagree with the idea that they can't contend next year. in the past, i thought that may be the case, but not if they're increasing payroll 15%. i gotta think it's nearly impossible to field a terrible team with a payroll that large.
×
×
  • Create New...