You don't get credit for an I told you so, as there was nothing to say this was coming. That's kind of a silly attitude, imo. Obviously he thought there was something. was it his 1.19 whip in '07? his nearly k per inning throughout 06-07? him being in the top 10 in the NL in h/9, k/9, k's, whip, etc in 2007? which of those are indicators of a future collapse? This is just my opinion, but for me it was really a lack of a 2nd quality pitch (no one pitch rich jokes please). He had an average fastball combined with a very good curveball. On days he didn't have his curveball there was not another pitch he could go to. He couldn't challenge hitters with his fastball and that led to a lot of nibbling and control problems because he couldn't get hitters out with it on a consistent basis. even if all that is true, why would you think he would lose the ability to throw his curveball? sure, he may not have it from start to start, but he obviously survived pretty well for 50 starts, and i'm assuming some days he didn't have it. people didn't like hill before his great 2007, and then continued to be skeptical about him based solely on the fact that they didn't like him pre-2006 or whatever.