Jump to content
North Side Baseball

abuck1220

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,511
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by abuck1220

  1. abuck1220

    Week 18

    yeah, i need to survive this week. then i think i get nc cubs the week after with a chance to move into a tie for the last playoff spot.
  2. abuck1220

    Week 18

    [expletive], i got some bad pitching draws this week...gonna be a tough one.
  3. i'd rather be DEAD than have peavy be a white sox (sock?).
  4. OH CRAP THE RED SOX GOT VICTOR MARTINEZ! WE'RE DOOMED!
  5. Why not? The possibility, however remote, of having to face Peavy in a World Series. geez, the trading deadline must be very stressful for you.
  6. i was hoping he'd get traded to the rockies or something.
  7. no, you definitely could not have.
  8. you know, the casual cub fan may not remember the alex gonzalez error in that inning. myself, however, being probably the best cubs fan ever, knows that was the real reason the cubs lot. now excuse me while i go eat my pregame taco bell (no lettuce).
  9. i love how pointing out all the other bad stuff that happened in that inning/game/series has become the measuring stick as to how good of a cubs fan you are.
  10. well, the reason he failed isn't the reason you said he'd fail. i guess that's my point. you seemed to say he didn't have the stuff to succeed and that doesn't appear to be the case.
  11. 7 out of 8 pitches were for strikes, also. I've heard things about Atkins for awhile now, let's just see what he's got. i think his 5,000 minor league innings have shown us what he's got.
  12. i'm sure bradley would take this platooning very well and not let it effect his play or demeanor at all.
  13. You don't get credit for an I told you so, as there was nothing to say this was coming. That's kind of a silly attitude, imo. Obviously he thought there was something. was it his 1.19 whip in '07? his nearly k per inning throughout 06-07? him being in the top 10 in the NL in h/9, k/9, k's, whip, etc in 2007? which of those are indicators of a future collapse? This is just my opinion, but for me it was really a lack of a 2nd quality pitch (no one pitch rich jokes please). He had an average fastball combined with a very good curveball. On days he didn't have his curveball there was not another pitch he could go to. He couldn't challenge hitters with his fastball and that led to a lot of nibbling and control problems because he couldn't get hitters out with it on a consistent basis. even if all that is true, why would you think he would lose the ability to throw his curveball? sure, he may not have it from start to start, but he obviously survived pretty well for 50 starts, and i'm assuming some days he didn't have it. people didn't like hill before his great 2007, and then continued to be skeptical about him based solely on the fact that they didn't like him pre-2006 or whatever.
  14. None of them. But it's a bit of a circlejerk to insist that stats are the only possible projection tool, and that anytime the stats are wrong it must be a fluke and there was no way anybody could have predicted it, and that anybody who did predict it wasn't really right. i don't think that's a circle jerk at all (whatever that means). just because people were right about him collapsing doesn't mean they were right for the correct reasons. he was a well above average pitcher for two seasons and nearly 50 starts, heading into his age 28 season. people who predicted his failure were taking stabs in the dark and got lucky.
  15. You don't get credit for an I told you so, as there was nothing to say this was coming. That's kind of a silly attitude, imo. Obviously he thought there was something. was it his 1.19 whip in '07? his nearly k per inning throughout 06-07? him being in the top 10 in the NL in h/9, k/9, k's, whip, etc in 2007? which of those are indicators of a future collapse?
  16. abuck told me that this is all Larry Rothschild's fault and that Hill would be straightened out as soon as he escaped Larry's evil spell. OH SNAP.
  17. enough about this stupid dropped third strike. it popped out of his glove for one second and he threw the guy out. stop making it sound like he kicked it around like benny hill and then threw it into the left field bleachers or something.
  18. you stop thinking impure thoughts about iowa's lil' sweetheart RIGHT NOW.
  19. this is your dream come true.
  20. the timing of that trade worked out pretty well for me.
  21. yeah, he sucks. i'm not arguing that. he should have been able to get the bunt down. but him not being able to do it really isn't any worse than lou asking him to do it when he must not be very good at it.
  22. why? you want ryan howard practicing bunts on the one in a million chance he's going to be asked to do it? just because you could bunt in high school against a guy throwing 68 mph doesn't mean every major leaguer is going to be able to do it against a major league pitcher.
  23. i hate this argument. you know, the one that assumes getting down a squeeze bunt is just as easy as putting the bat out there and viola the run scores. Not at all...but it should be pretty reasonable to ask for some contact... why? i'm sure it's not easy to get down a bunt when 1) you don't bunt very often 2) the opposing pitcher is jose valverde who is wild, throws hard and has tons of movement on his pitches and 3) it's a suicide squeeze in the 9th inning of a 1-1 game. i say fontenot gets the job done with that bunt maybe 50% of the time.
×
×
  • Create New...