He's also one of the highest paid QBs. And he's been a very average QB for a while now. I think very highly of the Ravens' front officer (Ozzie Newsome is the best GM in football), but they paid Flacco because he has a ring on his finger. That's it. I meant in what it measures - both look at an amount that a player is over a specified point. For WAR it's replacement, for DVOA it's average. If you're questioning the reliability, that's a legit argument, but in this case the more traditional stats match the advanced one. You are missing the whole GD point that you can't just dial up an average NFL QB. They aren't replacement players. They aren't 3rd starters in your rotation. They aren't prospects spending 6 years developing in your minor leagues and forced to play for the minimum their first three years. You can't replace one expensive one for two affordable ones and get similar production. It's the most important position in the game and without a competent one your team will blow and you will all lose your jobs. Tom Brady was just an average QB for years who got paid because of the rings then he pretty much dominated. I would hate for my team to go out and sign Flacco as their QB in some sort of effort to be a savior, but if the Bears win the Super Bowl this year and Cutler signs an even bigger deal I would be plenty happy. You pay QBs, or you spend a decade looking for his replacement.