Yeah, but with Bradley ready to be traded for pennies on the dollar, there's more money not available to upgrade the offense. I'm of the mind that there won't be a big bump in payroll next year, and with the limited flexibility because of existing contracts, not offering Harden arb is the most concrete way to add some maneuverability. Figure that if the Cubs pick up (liberal estimate) eight million of Bradley's 2010 contact along with ditching Harden, that potentially opens up $12 million. However, with salary increases for remaining players, it could drop that number significantly. When they end up with a rotation of Lilly, Zambrano, Dempster and 2 of Wells, Marshall, Gorzo and Shark, the moderate jump in offense they get with whoever replaces Bradley (actually they probably won't get a bump) won't matter.