Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. It wasn't very well written, but when taken in context I don't think there's any reason for a fan to be upset about it. He basically said we are upset about losses and don't need you to tell us to be more upset.
  2. Two pro bowl caliber running backs is always helpful.
  3. Where did you read it? I don't know what the jet sweep is, but teams put guys in motion all the time.
  4. One week further away from the disaster of week 1. That game really affected how many people viewed the Bears, and the further away it gets, the less influence it will have.
  5. What? You thought you couldn't snap the ball with a man in motion? Yes, you can, as long as it's parallel to the line and not moving forward. This doesnt say that: Legal Uses of Motion Any offensive player who is not on the line of scrimmage is allowed to change positions in this way, meaning that running backs, the quarterback and, in some cases, wide receivers and tight ends are allowed to move under the NFL Rules for "Man in Motion." They must arrive at their new destination and be set for one for second before the snap. Illegal Uses of Motion However, offensive linemen who are already set in their stance and receivers who are on the line of scrimmage may not go into motion under league rules. A team is penalized if an ineligible player moves, more than one player goes into motion at the same time, the player moves towards the line of scrimmage or if they are not in the set position long enough before the start of the play. Where did you get that from? You have to be set if there is a shift involving multiple players. But guys who are set off the line are allowed to go in motion and be in motion at the time of the snap (but only one guy can).
  6. I can't say I'd be opposed to parting with a mid-level draft pick for TO at this point. I wanted TO as a desperate attempt to help Orton, but I'm not so sure I'd want to be dealing away more draft picks for one year of TO. I'd have next to zero interest in bringing him back beyond this year. If they gave up a 4th in 2011 or something, I wouldn't be upset. But they are already low on picks next year and still need offensive line help plus fresh blood on defense.
  7. What? You thought you couldn't snap the ball with a man in motion? Yes, you can, as long as it's parallel to the line and not moving forward.
  8. He makes that little because his skills have declined and his attitude has kept suitors away. A non-dick TO could have been making over $10m this year.
  9. Yesterday the line was 3.5, it's already down to 3. Are there that many Bears fans who picked them this early? I felt pretty good getting that extra .5 point.
  10. Date & Time Favorite Line Underdog Total 10/18 1:00 ET At Washington -6.5 Kansas City 37 10/18 1:00 ET At Cincinnati -4.5 Houston 45 10/18 1:00 ET At Pittsburgh -14 Cleveland 38 10/18 1:00 ET At Minnesota -3 Baltimore 43.5 10/18 1:00 ET At Jacksonville -10 St. Louis 42 10/18 1:00 ET At New Orleans -3 NY Giants 47.5 10/18 1:00 ET Carolina -3.5 At Tampa Bay 39.5 10/18 1:00 ET At Green Bay -13.5 Detroit 48.5 10/18 4:05 ET Philadelphia -14 At Oakland 40.5 10/18 4:05 ET At Seattle -2.5 Arizona 47.5 10/18 4:15 ET At NY Jets -10* Buffalo 37.5* 10/18 4:15 ET At New England -9.5 Tennessee 43.5 10/18 8:20 ET At Atlanta -3 Chicago 46 Monday Night Football Line 10/19 8:35 ET At San Diego -4 Denver 44 Six more games with a line over a touchdown.
  11. Yeah, I'm sure he's here for at least this season. Maybe next year they'd pull the plug though.
  12. The suggestion is to do what you can to make the team better. Keeping TO does nothing to help the team win, trading him for picks that could make a difference going forward would be better. The fans might feel slighted early, but in the long run they should realize the benefits.
  13. McMahon and Harbaugh were both good enough to be franchise QBs in the right system. Say what you want about 60 years ago, but Turner has been in charge of the offense for most of the past 16 years. And in between he spent a lot of time at a Big Ten school that sucked. I'm not giving the organization a pass, Angelo's struggles with finding offensive lineman was evident when he was with Tampa. It's a combination of an organizational failure to fix the offensive line and relying on an offensive coordinator who is unable to maximize the talent given him or provide enough influence to find better talent.
  14. It might come to that with Huet, just an outright release. I'm certainly not up on how the cap hits work, but I'm sure Bowman will see if there are any trade options out there first. If eating some of his salary would be more beneficial than the cap hit from releasing him, might as well see if there is interest in him. I can't imagine there would be, but who knows. He has shown in the past he can be a stud, albeit for very short periods. I ended up listening to the 3rd period online. Wiedeman is a great listen. I think I've read that an outright release would simply erase a contract from the cap, although they'd obviously still owe it. I think the Blackhawks might actually be willing to do something like that as part of their solution to the Tallon mess. But it would have to be the last resort obviously.
  15. So what are the odds that the eventual solution to the salary cap mess includes releasing Huet to get his contract off the books next year or the following, like they almost did with Khabi last year? My faith in him was tenuous at best this offseason and he's obviously been very disappointing so far. As a directv customer I couldn't watch the game, but first time I checked on the phone it was 3-0, and literally the next two refreshes went to 4-0 and 5-0. I checked it when it was 5-1, then didn't see the score until it was 5-4, but since I couldn't watch, I went to bed and checked this morning. Wow, crazy game. Would have been nice to watch.
  16. You had a 4-0, 3-1, and two 2-2 teams that are considered playoff contenders on a bye, with every single bad team playing. This coming week you have a true headliner matchup at 1 and two more "should be decent games". The afternoon games kind of stink, but both primetime matchups at least look good on paper. But you're also missing a 5-0 team on a bye, a division leader, and a contender. But at least there's a bad team on a bye in Miami. I would be hesitant to call a team that leads the league in both rush offense and rush defense a "bad team" (especially when you're 1-3 and have been playing from behind most games). They outplayed the Colts on MNF and didn't play too badly on the road in Atlanta or in San Diego. They certainly won't be a playoff team, and as tough as their schedule has been so far it doesn't get any easier, but I could still see them winning 7 or 8 games. They are 1-3 and not a contender, I don't feel bad calling them a bad team.
  17. A handful of events spread out over 1600 games doesn't really reflect "better time" to me. 2003, 2007, 2008 had a lot of good times, most of the rest of the decade was filled with crap and/or disappointment.
  18. Every one of those veterans would have held out as well, and it wasn't like he had a Crabtree situation. Also he did not suck initially. He sucked after he finally got the job when the offensive line fell apart. That group peaked when Jones was still around, but they started to show their age in the Super Bowl season and completely disappeared a year later.
  19. Benson made things difficult, however, much of that difficulty was apparently due to being alienated by a group of veterans led by Olin Kreutz. The fact that Kreutz can win a battle of wills with a potential franchise back is a bad thing. As for Orton, I don't think it's a matter of better organizational focus. I think it has to do with having a weak OC and bad line. Orton was a guy who could do wel with a good line and a solid OC*. The Bears focused on QB a lot. But they ignored the line, and the one constant through the past two decades of struggling young QBs has been Ron Turner at OC. Sure there were a couple years where he was gone, but he has been at the helm for a very long time and the only times the Bears have had anything resembling stability at QB with him here is after acquiring established veterans. Going to Denver was absolutely the best thing that could have happened to his career. *Should also mention that Marshall is making Orton look much better than he is.
  20. You had a 4-0, 3-1, and two 2-2 teams that are considered playoff contenders on a bye, with every single bad team playing. This coming week you have a true headliner matchup at 1 and two more "should be decent games". The afternoon games kind of stink, but both primetime matchups at least look good on paper. But you're also missing a 5-0 team on a bye, a division leader, and a contender. But at least there's a bad team on a bye in Miami.
  21. There might not be any gimmes, but there is only one good team in that division as well. Both the others are mediocre.
  22. How much does the success of Benson and Orton in other uniforms reflect poorly on the Bears offensive line and Ron Turner? I think it's pretty significant. Throw Olin Kreutz name into that discussion. Your center should not be your best offensive lineman. It might be the 4th or 5th most important of the 5 spots. Everybody talks about how wonderful it is that this team is Olin's team and he's the leader on offense, but I don't think that's a good thing. They had to spend big on a proven franchise QB (not to mention an approaching washed-up status HOF tackle) just to become a decent offense. Orton and Benson both had abilities that the Bears could not maximize, partly because their coordinator isn't any good, and partly because their line has been a major weak point.
  23. i think that's still highly unlikely, probably more 6-8 range We probably only have 3 solid wins on the schedule at this point (Buf, StL, Sea) and considering Seattle as any kind of a solid win is probably stretching it a bit. We'll likely be 0-6 entering the bye and we have Jacksonville and San Francisco immediately after it. 0-8 to start the year is a real possibility. This team as it's playing now isn't likely to win 5 games. Yeah, they aren't going to win at Seattle, but they should win against Jax at home.
  24. And what a magic word it is.
  25. I think the Cubs should trade him down the line, but who out there who could take over for him at a decent level of production? I could see trading him next offseason if guys like Castro and Barney develop as planned, but trading him now? That'd be an issue, imo. i guess it depends whether you think that blanco could be not-horrible offensively. he'd certainly be well above average with the glove, but at the plate he'd probably be a complete black hole. Would it be too weird to sign Chone Figgins for shortstop and start Blanco there on days Figgins plays another position or gets a day off? I know Figgins hasn't played much at the position recently but it doesn't sound too far fetched. Theriot's trade value is tied to his affordability and relative youth. As he enters his 30's and gets closer to free agency, his value plummets. And I don't see how Figgins can be thought of for SS. He turns 32 this winter and hasn't played an inning at short since he was 28. He hasn't played any significant innings there since he was 26, and only had 80 innings there. 30-something middle infielders are risky, not to mention guys that haven't been playing middle infield.
×
×
  • Create New...