It wasn't an argument. It was my opinion. Fair enough, just think it's a bit over the top. How so? The statement about them moving the statue was a joke. I don't actually expect that to happen or even care that it does or doesn't. I just was never a fan of Harry's, even when I was younger, and I think that the first statue they put up at Wrigley is one of him is silly. That's it. It's not like any of the reasons I listed for not being a fan of his are somehow wrong or unjustified. They're all subjective. Well like I said, he wasn't the lovable loser that didn't care about the outcome as you claim. He hardly personifies that crowd. And he spent more than enough time in Chicago to be mostly associated with them. It is quite pathetic that he was the first statue, but not entirely unjustified, given the fact that this team isn't exactly overrunning with successful players that had to be honored. The whole idea of a statue for a player or announcer is just silly to begin with. But within the generally accepted practice of building statues for personalities involved with sports, Harry fits with room to spare. At least it's not Rocky.