I started writing a post yesterday about Q and the high turnover rate of NHL coaches but erased it because I felt a little too reactionary with the recent slump. But I do wonder when Q will start feeling some heat. The team is still in fine shape standings wise and should be able to have a successful season. They are only 1+ seasons removed from a Stanley Cup and Q's winning percentage is higher than all 5 coaches left on the tenure list ahead of him (although McLellen is right there with him in tenure and has a higher %). The success can't be questioned. But I do think the direction is somewhat in doubt. NHL coaches tend to turnover quickly, and sometimes almost out of nowhere. Well over half the coaches in the league took over in 2009 or later, and only 5 took their jobs before 2008. Obviously this is in my mind because of a couple of recent firings, both following prolonged losing streaks. I doubt Q goes with a 7 or 8 game losing streak. But if this team fails to get out of the first round of the playoffs this year, the talk may begin. And if they fall out of playoff contention, my guess is any slump next year will be trouble. Of course, this also raises the question about when Bowman will feel heat, as in my opinion, he's yet to do anything to actually improve the team since taking over, with most of his moves being salary cap related and cutting back on skill.