Final Rankings Before Title Game: First the Conferences New Old 59.92 60.01 Big 12 58.61 59.69 ACC 58.48 56.47 SEC 54.98 52.97 PAC 10 54.10 55.81 Big Ten 53.66 53.30 Big East 51.66 51.13 MWC 42.19 40.70 CUSA 41.88 42.56 WAC 41.21 41.60 IND 39.15 41.92 MAC 34.97 34.13 Sun Belt AS you can see, the SEC looked like it was down year prior to the bowls, but had widespread gains to make a pretty big move pu in the rankings. The Pac 10 also had large gains across the board. The Big Ten fell behind the Pac 10, but not enough to fall behind the Big East as the worst BCS conferences. The MWC was close to becoming the second conference in history to be higher than a BCS conference. They did it in 2004 finishing ahead of the Big East, which was the Big East's first year after Miami and Virginia Tech left. Next year looks to be like a down year for the Mid-majors. The WAC's Boise State Broncos travel to Oregon the first month of the season. They'll lose that one, for sure. As far as the MWC goes. Brigham Young travels to Dallas to play Oklahoma. That's going to be a woodshed beating. They take on the much improved 'Noles, that's going to be a beatdown though it is a home game. Utah also travels to Oregon, like Boise and also has Louisville coming. They have road games vs TCU and BYU next year. Much tougher schedule. Finally, TCU has an easier schedule with their one decent non-conference game being Virginia. It's going to be a down year for mid-majors, I think. The Pac 10 ought to be much improved. The SEC should be about the same. The ACC will be fine. The Big Ten should improve and the Big XII will regress. The Big East does not matter and neither does the Sun Belt, CUSA or especially the crappy MAC.