yes, this. I don't know. I see value in it. Lets say they do get one guy who will slot right into the rotation. Fill the other spot with a cheap stop gap, if Maholm could net you say, a 1st round competitive balance pick. The worse rotation helps to secure #1 draft next year + another mid rounder. Oh I could see the benefit of that. If next year you could get a pick for arb on Maholm then the other team has to offer even more on top of that. Overall I agree, unless it's a return that nets more obvious assets than we'd get keeping him.