Raiders surprised me. I don't think they can pass on one of the 2 DL on the board (Ellis, Gholston). Clady is probably an overdraft at #4 for a team without a complete desperate need (KC at 5 would not apply, because OL is by far their biggest need). If I'm the Raiders, I flip a coin on the DL-men and gamble that Williams or Baker will be there in the 2nd. That's true about Oakland. Fwiw, I would've taken Ellis over Clady despite KC needing OL badly, he was too much of a reach at #5. Me too, but that's because I think Ellis is going to be an elite DT right off the bat. I wouldn't fault KC for picking either way though.