While I understand your point, I think that there are two places where I disagree: 1) I think the Cubs can compete as soon as 2012, depending on the available resources and being able to make a few key moves. This means that the remaining peak years will be extremely valuable to making this happen. As we've seen twice from St Louis, all you have to do is make the playoffs - anything can happen from there. 2) While Pujols will inevitably start to decline during this contract, he's starting from a peak as one of the 5-10 best hitters of all time. Even declining production from Albert will still be very good until near the end of the contract. I do agree with both points and I won't be upset if they do sign him, but my preference would simply be that they don't. I agree that the Cubs can compete in 2012, but I also believe at some point they have to make decisions that are either best for today or best for the long term. While those decisions are not always mutually exclusive, they definitely can be. I truly think Epstein's comments thus far indicate an unwillingness to overspend on a player toward the end of his prime, so I would consider Fielder a much more realistic possibility.