Irrelevant Dude

he looked like he was swinging a bat made of lead. He swings it better with fans in the stands. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

This is an odd postponement. You know MLB is eyeing a potential prime time spot Saturday night.

Really went out with a bang there.

What happened to angry KB?

That is your take away from this? 6 scoreless innings from Hendricks wasn't good enough? They are both starting a game one way or another.

He is a perfectly adequate backup catcher, but certainly not a DH.

So many weak pop outs.

I can't even imagine. 18 straight playoff losses. How is that even possible?

Yep, so now Hendricks was left in too long, the Cubs are losing, and Hamilton is in the lineup instead of Schwarber. Horribly mismanaged.

No activity in the bullpen... Come on Ross, you're pushing your luck.

I don't like the Billy Hamilton defensive substitution this early in a one-run game. If the Marlins get a run, that spot will be due up in the 9th inning (if not sooner).

Phew. That's enough for Hendricks today. He has been a little off all game, but take the 6 scoreless and hope the pen can hold it down.

This would be a good spot for a LOOGY.

Thank you!

Man, Kyle is fighting it today. We're lucky to still be at 0-0.

1pm start Wednesday is certainly not ideal. Looks like I'll be trying to reschedule some work meetings. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

i don't think even brewers fans are excited It's hard to get excited about a bunch of .500 and below .500 teams battling for playoff spots on the last day. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Brewers made the playoffs with a 29-31 record, what a joke. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

I was going to post the same thing. I'll take mean streak Bryant for the rest of the season. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

White Sox pitching blows. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

That is correct according to this: https://www.mlb.com/news/cardinals-tigers-september-28-games-scenarios Just want to note that in order for the Cards to tie, they have to win their last 4, which include 2 against the Brewers. By winning those 2 games, they would have a better intradivision record than the Cubs and would then have the tie breaker (23-17 vs 22-18). So yes, if the Cubs lose the next two, the Cards then have to play at least 1 more game (if they lose the first game against the Tigers, they wouldn't play the second). Not that I want the Cubs to lose, but it would be great for the Cardinals to play both games of the double header and lose the last one. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Even when their team is good, the inferiority complex still persists Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Doesn't the shift play into that value proposition though? Why hit for contact if someone is going to be positioned where you are likely to hit the ball? That pushes hitters even further into selling out for power.

Up until this year, my opinion has always been that MLB should not legislate defensive positioning, meaning teams should be able to shift however they want. I have thought that hitters can and should adapt to counter the shift and hit the ball into the large open spaces on the field. Upon further review, I'm not sure MLB has the luxury of waiting for hitters to adapt, when it isn't inevitable that will ever happen. With batting averages trending down over recent years, I think the game is suffering notably from a lack of sustained offense. There are certainly other factors involved (increased reliance on home runs, increased strikeout rates, etc.), but the shift is also playing a big part in taking singles away from hitters. I think MLB should consider doing something, if not multiple things, to get the ball in play and to provide more positive results when the ball is put into play. One of those changes could be a ban on the shift, enforcing that there must be 2 infielders on each side of the field, and that they can't play behind second base. The shift has revolutionized defense. When only a handful of teams were doing it, it was innovative and somewhat interesting. Now that shifting has been adopted all across MLB, I just don't think the results are good for the game. This may be an overreaction due to an unusual outlier season, and/or an overreaction due to a historically bad Cubs offense, but I don't know how much of an outlier this season really is. I'm willing to wait and see if offenses bounce back next year, but I am certainly open to changes now or in the near future. Banning the shift would be much less offensive to me than the 3-batter rule for pitchers or the runner on second base in extra innings. Will the shift be addressed by MLB at some point or is it here to stay?

Quick, someone check the rulebook. What does it mean??? Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk