One of the reasons cited for dumping Ortiz was the belief that he could not and would not ever hit left-handed pitching. Certainly, it was true in 2002 that he could not hit LHP with the Twins, but he mashed RHP. Reason enough to keep him and try to work on his development against LHP ? After all, he had just turned 26. 2002, Twins, vs. LHP: .637 OPS in 118 AB 2002, Twins, vs. RHP: .919 OPS in 294 AB Then, the move to Boston: 2003, vs. LHP: .674 OPS in 116 AB 2003, vs. RHP: 1.058 OPS in 332 AB 2004, vs. LHP: .784 OPS in 196 AB 2004, vs. RHP: 1.084 OPS in 386 AB 2005, vs. LHP: .894 OPS in 205 AB 2005, vs. RHP: 1.058 OPS in 332 AB 2006, vs. LHP: .870 OPS in 97 AB 2006, vs. RHP: .975 OPS in 176 AB Would that kind of development have occured in Minnesota ? Who knows. Through his struggles, through pennant races, Boston continued to allow him to hit everyone. And, look at the rewards. Matt Murton will never be David Ortiz, but stories like Ortiz just kill me. Teams give up on young players because they assume the player can't do something. Other teams focus on that players strengths and look it improve those weaknesses to an acceptable level.