Good question, Serena. My take is that I don't look at this as a moral issue, but instead a strict contractual issue that helps ensure that any potentially reckless or dangerous behavior will not occur. Similar to the many contract clauses prohibiting riding motorcycles, playing pick-up basketball, sky diving, flag football, etc. Yes, every professional athlete who drinks runs the risk of drinking and driving, but if you've been convicted two times already, I think that puts you at a higher risk than someone who has never been pulled over or convicted. That's how I look at it. And, also, just suppose that it's known in the baseball circles that Furcal is an alcoholic (again, suppose) who doesn't admit it and won't seek help. This could also be one way of helping him avoid a potentially hazardous situation. Again, I don't know, but it could be a possibility. I don't disagree with the reasoning; I guess the distinction between the moral/contractual issues seem a bit fuzzy in this specific instance and that's what gives me pause. If it were a player that people had coveted -- say, Brian Giles -- and Giles subsequently said that he turned down the Cubs because of a similar clause, there might be more concern ... or maybe not if he had the same history as Furcal. Meh, I'm still undecided. Prior and Wood said after the Jason Williams' motorcycle accident that they had clauses preventing them from snow skiing and skydiving among other things (I just remember those two).