i judge hendry by wins. and in that regard, he's bad. and if you judge him by win per dollar, he's the worst. Fair enough. really? so dusty was a good manager in '03 and '04, a below average one in '05 and, finally, a bad one in '06? Jim Hendry makes the moves. These moves should be evaluated separately from the wins/losses that result. Whether or not he is a good GM is based on his decision-making BEFORE the fact, not after. So why judge what happens after? Who's responsible for the Manager? Everything aside from the size of the payroll is under the umbrella of the GM. That certainly hasn't been an issue, so therefore all the failures of the team are his responsibility. I didn't make my dusty comment clear enough. Was dusty actually a more compentent, smarter manager in the years the team won more games? Even then he had the same flaws we all complained about the last couple years. But dusty aside, my point was that in evaluating Hendry you must look at the deals he made separate from how they worked out. The Nomar trade was very well orchestrated, especially given that we didn't give up much. I give him that credit without mentioning that Nomar tore a hamstring (or whatever) and the team floundered amidst other injuries.